Prevalence of adherence to oral antidiabetic drugs in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Author:

Boonpattharatthiti Kansak12,Songkla Pirune Na23,Chantara Junpen24,Koomsri Chanchanok25,Krass Ines6,Chaiyakunapruk Nathorn78ORCID,Dhippayom Teerapon2

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences Burapha University Chon buri Thailand

2. The Research Unit of Evidence Synthesis (TRUES), Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences Naresuan University Phitsanulok Thailand

3. Department of Clinical Pharmacy Siriraj Piyamaharajkarun Hospital Bangkok Thailand

4. Department of Pharmacy Nakornmaesot International Hospital Tak Thailand

5. Department of Clinical Pharmacy Chonburi Hospital Chon buri Thailand

6. School of Pharmacy The University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia

7. Department of Pharmacotherapy, College of Pharmacy University of Utah Salt Lake City Utah USA

8. IDEAS Center Veterans Affairs Salt Lake City Healthcare System Salt Lake City Utah USA

Abstract

ABSTRACTIntroductionThe treatment of type 2 diabetes requires multidimensional management, with medication adherence a crucial aspect of diabetes control. However, recent rigorous estimates of adherence to oral antidiabetic drugs (OAD) are lacking. The objective of this study is to determine the prevalence of adherence to OAD in type 2 diabetes patients.MethodsA systematic search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and CINAHL from July 2013 to April 2023. Cross‐sectional studies published in English were included if they met the following criteria: (1) reported the adherence to OAD using a validated measure; and (2) had a sample size of at least 385 patients with type 2 diabetes. The Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal for studies reporting prevalence data was used to assess the quality of the included studies. Pooled estimates of the prevalence of adherence to OAD were calculated as a percentage together with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) using a random‐effect model. All analyses were conducted using STATA 17.0; PROSPERO (CRD42023414264).ResultsTwenty‐six studies involving a total of 69,366 patients met the selection criteria and were included in the meta‐analysis. The overall estimated prevalence of adherence to OAD was 55.53% (95%CI: 44.22%–66.85%). Among the included studies, nine were deemed to be of high quality. A sensitivity analysis conducted using only the high‐quality studies revealed a prevalence of adherence to OAD at 52.24% (95% CI: 39.63%–64.85%).ConclusionsThe overall prevalence of adherence to OAD was remarkably low among type 2 diabetes patients worldwide. Healthcare practitioners and policy makers should employ appropriate approaches to improve adherence to OAD.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference56 articles.

1. Defining and characterizing the progression of type 2 diabetes;Fonseca VA;Diabetes Care,2009

2. Microvascular and macrovascular complications of diabetes;Fowler MJ;Clin Diabetes,2008

3. 9. Pharmacologic approaches to glycemic treatment: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2023;ElSayed NA;Diabetes Care,2022

4. Adherence to diabetes medication: A systematic review;Krass I;Diabet Med,2015

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3