Network meta‐analysis: Comparative onset of early effect of biologics and small molecules in moderately to severely active luminal Crohn's disease

Author:

Attauabi Mohamed1234ORCID,Steenholdt Casper1ORCID,Poulsen Anja5ORCID,Gubatan John6ORCID,Burisch Johan234ORCID,Nielsen Ole Haagen14ORCID,Seidelin Jakob Benedict14ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Copenhagen University Hospital—Herlev and Gentofte Herlev Denmark

2. Gastrounit, Medical Section Copenhagen University Hospital—Amager and Hvidovre Hvidovre Denmark

3. Copenhagen Center for Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Children, Adolescents, and Adults, Hvidovre Hospital Hvidovre Denmark

4. Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark

5. Digestive Disease Center Bispebjerg University Hospital Bispebjerg Denmark

6. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford California USA

Abstract

SummaryIntroductionRapidity of effect of advanced therapies for patients with Crohn's disease (CD) can be an essential decision parameter; however, comparative evaluation is lacking. We aimed to compare early response for advanced CD therapies in a network meta‐analysis (NMA).MethodsWe searched systematically MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL up to 19 February 2024, for randomised controlled trials. The co‐primary outcomes were induction of clinical remission (Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) ≤150) and clinical response (≥100‐point reduction in CDAI) within the first 6 weeks of treatment. We incorporated any assessment within this time point in a Bayesian random‐effects NMA following PRISMA‐NMA guidance (PROSPERO ID: CRD42022368509).ResultsTwenty‐five studies, comprising 7414 patients, were included. Infliximab combined with azathioprine or monotherapy ranked highest for induction of clinical remission within 6 weeks and was significantly superior to certolizumab, ustekinumab, guselkumab, vedolizumab, and upadacitinib. However, superiority over risankizumab 600 mg and adalimumab 160/80 mg was non‐significant. Accordingly, infliximab in combination with azathioprine and guselkumab 600 mg ranked highest in the corresponding analysis of clinical response with no statistical significance demonstrated. Among bio‐exposed patients, none of whom received infliximab, upadacitinib, and risankizumab induced the highest clinical responses. On the other hand, vedolizumab, certolizumab, and ustekinumab ranked lowest across the analyses.ConclusionsWe found infliximab to be ranked highest and superior to all other agents but risankizumab and adalimumab, demonstrating the highest probability of early induction of remission. Upadacitinib and risankizumab induced the highest clinical responses in bio‐exposed patients. However, infliximab was not investigated in this population.

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3