Conspiracy Theory as Individual and Group Behavior: Observations from the Flat Earth International Conference

Author:

Fernbach Philip M.1ORCID,Bogard Jonathan E.2

Affiliation:

1. Leeds School of Business University of Colorado at Boulder

2. Olin Business School Washington University in St. Louis

Abstract

AbstractConspiratorial thinking has been with humanity for a long time but has recently grown as a source of societal concern and as a subject of research in the cognitive and social sciences. We propose a three‐tiered framework for the study of conspiracy theories: (1) cognitive processes, (2) the individual, and (3) social processes and communities of knowledge. At the level of cognitive processes, we identify explanatory coherence and faulty belief updating as critical ideas. At the level of the community of knowledge, we explore how conspiracy communities facilitate false belief by promoting a contagious sense of understanding, and how community norms catalyze the biased assimilation of evidence. We review recent research on conspiracy theories and explain how conspiratorial thinking emerges from the interaction of individual and group processes. As a case study, we describe observations the first author made while attending the Flat Earth International Conference, a meeting of conspiracy theorists who believe the Earth is flat. Rather than treating conspiracy belief as pathological, we take the perspective that is an extreme outcome of common cognitive processes.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Artificial Intelligence,Cognitive Neuroscience,Human-Computer Interaction,Linguistics and Language,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Reference104 articles.

1. Beliefs in Conspiracies

2. Missing the trees for the forest: A construal level account of the illusion of explanatory depth.

3. How conspiracy theories are shaping the 2020 election—and shaking the foundation of American democracy;Alter C.;Time,2020

4. Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments;Asch S. E.;Organizational Influence Processes,1951

5. Political paranoiav.political realism: on distinguishing between bogus conspiracy theories and genuine conspiratorial politics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3