Affiliation:
1. Department of Psychology University of Edinburgh
2. Institute of Language, Cognition & Computation Informatics University of Edinburgh
Abstract
AbstractAn open question regarding how people develop their models of the world is how new candidates are generated for consideration out of infinitely many possibilities. We discuss the role that evolutionary mechanisms play in this process. Specifically, we argue that when it comes to developing a global world model, innovation is necessarily incremental, involving the generation and selection among random local mutations and recombinations of (parts of) one's current model. We argue that, by narrowing and guiding exploration, this feature of cognitive search is what allows human learners to discover better theories, without ever grappling directly with the problem of finding a “global optimum,” or best possible world model. We suggest this aspect of cognitive processing works analogously to how blind variation and selection mechanisms drive biological evolution. We propose algorithms developed for program synthesis provide candidate mechanisms for how human minds might achieve this. We discuss objections and implications of this perspective, finally suggesting that a better process‐level understanding of how humans incrementally explore compositional theory spaces can shed light on how we think, and provide explanatory traction on fundamental cognitive biases, including anchoring, probability matching, and confirmation bias.
Funder
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Subject
Artificial Intelligence,Cognitive Neuroscience,Human-Computer Interaction,Linguistics and Language,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Reference148 articles.
1. Random walks on semantic networks can resemble optimal foraging.
2. Andrychowicz M. Denil M. Gomez S. Hoffman M. W. Pfau D. Schaul T. Shillingford B. &De Freitas N.(2016).Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 29.
3. Can a mechanical chess‐player outplay its designer?;Ashby W. R.;British Journal for the Philosophy of Science,1952
4. Aunger R.(2000).Darwinizing culture: The status of memetics as a science.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献