Local Search and the Evolution of World Models

Author:

Bramley Neil R.1ORCID,Zhao Bonan1,Quillien Tadeg2,Lucas Christopher G.2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology University of Edinburgh

2. Institute of Language, Cognition & Computation Informatics University of Edinburgh

Abstract

AbstractAn open question regarding how people develop their models of the world is how new candidates are generated for consideration out of infinitely many possibilities. We discuss the role that evolutionary mechanisms play in this process. Specifically, we argue that when it comes to developing a global world model, innovation is necessarily incremental, involving the generation and selection among random local mutations and recombinations of (parts of) one's current model. We argue that, by narrowing and guiding exploration, this feature of cognitive search is what allows human learners to discover better theories, without ever grappling directly with the problem of finding a “global optimum,” or best possible world model. We suggest this aspect of cognitive processing works analogously to how blind variation and selection mechanisms drive biological evolution. We propose algorithms developed for program synthesis provide candidate mechanisms for how human minds might achieve this. We discuss objections and implications of this perspective, finally suggesting that a better process‐level understanding of how humans incrementally explore compositional theory spaces can shed light on how we think, and provide explanatory traction on fundamental cognitive biases, including anchoring, probability matching, and confirmation bias.

Funder

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Artificial Intelligence,Cognitive Neuroscience,Human-Computer Interaction,Linguistics and Language,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Reference148 articles.

1. Random walks on semantic networks can resemble optimal foraging.

2. Andrychowicz M. Denil M. Gomez S. Hoffman M. W. Pfau D. Schaul T. Shillingford B. &De Freitas N.(2016).Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 29.

3. Can a mechanical chess‐player outplay its designer?;Ashby W. R.;British Journal for the Philosophy of Science,1952

4. Aunger R.(2000).Darwinizing culture: The status of memetics as a science.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3