Treatment of functional dyspepsia in Chinese adult patients with domperidone: A multicenter, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled pilot study

Author:

Fang Xiu Cai1ORCID,Lin Zhi Hui2ORCID,Wu Yong Dong3,Tian De An4,Liu Shi5,Wu Dong Sheng1,Lin Han2,Meng Fan Dong3,Liu Mei4,Du Fan5,Shu Hui Jun1,Wang Zhi Feng1,Zhuo Jian Min6,Wang Ping7,Li Meng Yu7,Xu Jian7

Affiliation:

1. Department of Gastroenterology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College Beijing China

2. Department of Gastroenterology, Fujian Provincial Hospital Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University Fuzhou Fujian Province China

3. Department of Gastroenterology, Beijing Friendship Hospital Capital Medical University Beijing China

4. Department of Gastroenterology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College Huazhong University of Science and Technology Wuhan Hubei Province China

5. Department of Gastroenterology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College Huazhong University of Science and Technology Wuhan Hubei Province China

6. Janssen China R&D Shanghai China

7. OTC Medical Affairs, Xi'an Janssen Pharmaceutical Ltd Beijing China

Abstract

ObjectiveThis pilot study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of domperidone for the treatment of Chinese patients with functional dyspepsia (FD) who were diagnosed according to the Rome IV criteria and to identify the FD subtypes that potentially responded better to domperidone.MethodsThis multicenter prospective study was conducted in China from August 2018 to July 2020, consisting of a 1‐week screening phase and a 2‐week double‐blind treatment phase. Participants were randomized to receive domperidone 10 mg or matching placebo tablets thrice daily for 14 days. The primary end‐point was the overall treatment effect (OTE) response rate after 2‐week therapy.ResultsAltogether 160 patients were included, with 80 patients in each group. The OTE response rate after 2‐week therapy was significantly higher for domperidone compared with placebo (60.7% vs 46.0%; relative risk [RR] 1.318, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.972–1.787). Moreover, the OTE response rate after 2‐week domperidone or placebo treatment was 60.3% versus 54.9% for postprandial distress syndrome (PDS) (RR 1.098, 95% CI 0.750–1.607) and 60.6% versus 35.2% for overlapping PDS–epigastric pain syndrome (EPS) (RR 1.722, 95% CI 0.995–2.980). Adverse events were reported by seven patients in the domperidone group and 12 patients in the placebo group. None of the adverse events in the domperidone group were serious.ConclusionDomperidone showed a positive pattern regarding OTE response rates after 2‐week therapy compared to placebo in patients with FD, as well as in subtypes of PDS and overlapping PDS–EPS. No new safety issue was observed.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Gastroenterology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3