Affiliation:
1. Department of Geosciences University of Arkansas Fayetteville Arkansas USA
2. Department of Geosciences Boise State University Boise Idaho USA
3. Chevron Technical Center Houston Texas USA
Abstract
AbstractU–Pb dating of zircon via laser ablation‐inductively coupled plasma‐mass spectrometry (LA‐ICP‐MS) has become a primary method for determining the age of crystalline rocks and the provenance and maximum depositional age of (meta)sedimentary rocks. Although chemical abrasion has become a standard approach for mitigating Pb loss in zircon dated via high‐resolution thermal ionization mass spectrometry (CA‐TIMS), laser ablation dating is rarely accompanied by chemical abrasion. We evaluate the accuracy of U–Pb dates acquired via LA‐ICP‐MS relative to CA‐TIMS through analysis of a large database of paired analyses from the same zircon crystals. We show that laser ablation 206Pb/238U dates are systematically younger than their CA‐TIMS counterparts, with a greater shift in detrital zircon (−2.0%) versus igneous or metamorphic zircon (−0.9%). Although systematic biases related to “matrix effects” may be a contributing factor, our analysis suggests that unmitigated cryptic Pb loss is likely widespread in laser ablation U–Pb datasets.