A cross‐sectional content quality analysis of information in TikTok videos on “Dermarolling (Roller Microneedling)”

Author:

Awad Nardin1,Hetzel John1,Bhupalam Vishnu1,Nestor Mark S.12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Center for Clinical and Cosmetic Research Aventura Florida USA

2. Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine Miami Florida USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundTikTok is one of the fastest‐growing social media platform, and its short‐form videos have become a widely used source of health information. “Dermarolling” is a form of roller microneedling often practiced at home, and patients may be using TikTok to inform their decision to pursue this treatment and their practice of it.AimsThis study assessed the informational content quality, source, and engagement of TikTok dermarolling videos to highlight potentially harmful social media trends.MethodsOn a predetermined date, “dermarolling” was searched on TikTok. The top 75 results were screened. Number of views, creator type, type of video, and whether risks were discussed were recorded. Information quality was assessed using the DISCERN tool. The data were stratified by creator type, and statistical analysis was performed using R version 4.3.2. Median viewership and DISCERN scores were compared using Kruskal–Wallis tests with post hoc pairwise Wilcoxon tests. Fisher's exact test was used to compare rates of risk discussion between groups.ResultsSixty‐one of the reviewed videos met the inclusion criteria. Influencer videos engaged the largest overall audience and had higher median viewership than other creators. Physicians, primarily dermatologists, created exclusively educational content and influencers created mostly experience‐based content. Overall content quality was generally low‐moderate, with a median (IQR) DISCERN score of 30.5 (26.5–33.5). Physician content had higher median DISCERN scores than influencers (p = 0.004) and others (p = 0.004). Physicians were more likely to discuss risks compared to influencers (p = 0.02).ConclusionsTikTok content on “dermarolling” was of relatively low quality, and nonphysicians command a large viewership. Physician‐created content is often of higher informational quality, and dermatologists should escalate their efforts to engage patients in this space to mitigate the effects of potential misinformation.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference13 articles.

1. BrandonJ.Instagram is outpacing TikTok for user growth. Here's why. Published June 24 2023. Accessed October 14 2023.https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnbbrandon/2023/06/24/instagram‐is‐outpacing‐tiktok‐for‐user‐growth‐heres‐why/?sh=6c519efc5dbd

2. Microneedling with dermaroller

3. Microneedling for Hair Loss

4. A systematic review examining the potential adverse effects of microneedling;Gowda A;J Clin Aesthet Dermatol,2021

5. DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3