Not‐so‐simple nephrectomy: Comparative analysis of radical and simple nephrectomy in a high‐volume tertiary referral center

Author:

Papadopoulou Ariadni1ORCID,Campain Nicholas2,Abu‐Ghanem Yasmin2,Shanmugathas Nimlan3ORCID,Poullas Marios45,Mumtaz Faiz2,Barod Ravi2,Tran Maxine2,Bex Axel2,Patki Prasad23

Affiliation:

1. Division of Surgery and Interventional Science University College London, Royal Free Hospital London UK

2. The Specialist Centre for Kidney Cancer Royal Free Hospital London UK

3. Department of Urology Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust London UK

4. Department of Cell and Developmental Biology University College London London UK

5. Department of Computer Science Neapolis University Pafos Pafos Cyprus

Abstract

ObjectivesSimple nephrectomies can be challenging with significant morbidity. To prove the hypothesis of “not‐so‐simple” nephrectomy, we compared demographics, perioperative outcomes, and complications between simple and radical nephrectomy in a tertiary referral center.MethodsWe analyzed 473 consecutive radical nephrectomies (January 2018–October 2020) and simple nephrectomies (January 2016–October 2020). Univariate and multivariate analysis of perioperative outcomes utilized the Mann–Whitney U test, Chi‐squared test, Mantel–Haenszel test of trend, and multiple linear regression. Radical nephrectomies were classified in cT1, cT2a, and cT2b‐T3 subgroups and compared to simple nephrectomies. Minimally invasive and open techniques were compared between the two groups. Infected versus non‐infected simple nephrectomies were compared.ResultsA total of 344 radical and 129 simple nephrectomies were included. Simple nephrectomy was an independent predictor of increased operative time (p = 0.001), length of stay (p = 0.049), and postoperative complications (p < 0.001). Simple nephrectomies had higher operative time (p < 0.001), length of stay (p = 0.014), and postoperative morbidity (p < 0.001) than cT1 radical nephrectomies and significantly more Clavien 1–2 complications than cT2a radical nephrectomies (p = 0.001). The trend was similar in minimally invasive operations. However, conversion to open rates was not significantly different. Infected simple nephrectomies had increased operative time (p < 0.001), length of stay (p = 0.005), blood loss (p = 0.016), and intensive care stay (p = 0.019).ConclusionsPatients undergoing simple nephrectomy experienced increased operative time and morbidity. Simple nephrectomy carries higher morbidity than radical nephrectomy in tumors ≤10 cm. Robotic simple nephrectomies may reduce open conversion rates. Postoperative intensive care and enhanced recovery may be essential in simple nephrectomy planning with infected pathology.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Urology

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3