Authority Over Investigation Decisions in Child Welfare Services: How is it Distributed Among Social Workers, Managers and Citizen Representatives?

Author:

Wollter Filip1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Social Sciences Marie Cederschiöld University Stockholm Sweden

Abstract

ABSTRACTThis study examined the distribution of authority over decisions made during investigations within child welfare services (CWS). The distribution between various actors, such as social workers, citizen representatives and managers, was examined regarding 19 key decisions that frequently occur during investigations. The study also examined how the municipal socio‐economic status and the internal organizational conditions of CWS impact the overall hierarchical level of authority using linear regression analysis. The study was a full population study of Swedish municipalities and districts in larger cities (n = 309, response rate of 62%). The study indicates that the head of the unit holds authority over most decision types, followed by the social worker. However, the study also indicates that there are significant variations between municipalities and decision types. In the municipality delegating authority to the lowest hierarchical level, social workers hold authority over 15 decision types compared with two decision types in the municipality delegating authority to the highest hierarchical level. This variation concerns most decision types except two, where authority is almost exclusively delegated to the same actor in all municipalities. The regression analysis indicated that the educational level of the municipal inhabitants and the size of the CWS budget were the strongest predictors of the hierarchical level of authority in a municipality. High educational levels in municipalities are associated with delegating authority to low hierarchical levels, such as social workers, whereas large CWS budgets (spending as SEK per inhabitant) are associated with delegating authority to high hierarchical levels, such as top‐level managers. The implications of these results for social work research and practice are discussed.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference41 articles.

1. Measures of Accountability and Delegated Discretion in Activation Work: Lessons From the Norwegian Labour and Welfare Service;Alm Andreassen T.;European Journal of Social Work,2019

2. Andersson E.2007. ““But Can't We Help Then” – An Interview With Five Social Workers About Social Services Collaboration.” Bachelor thesis Stockholm University.

3. New Public Management and Social Work in Sweden and England: Challenges and Opportunities for Staff in Predominantly Female Organizations;Berg E.;International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy,2008

4. Children's and Young People's Participation Within Child Welfare and Child Protection Services: A State‐of‐the‐Art Review;Bijleveld G.;Child & Family Social Work,2015

5. Reconsidering Critical Appraisal in Social Work: Choice, Care and Organization in Real‐Time Treatment Decisions;Björk A.;Nordic Social Work Research,2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3