Peripheral intravenous catheter clinical care standard adherence in emergency departments: A qualitative study underpinned by the behaviour change wheel

Author:

Xu Hui1234ORCID,Bowdery Julie4,To Yeng4,Duff Jed12,Griffin Bronwyn56,Ullman Amanda J.3678ORCID,Rickard Claire M.3789,Plummer Karin56ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Nursing Queensland University of Technology Brisbane Queensland Australia

2. Nursing and Midwifery Research Centre Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital Brisbane Queensland Australia

3. Alliance for Vascular Access Teaching and Research (AVATAR), School of Nursing and Midwifery and Pharmacy and Medical Sciences Griffith University Brisbane Queensland Australia

4. Emergency Department Queen Elizabeth II Jubilee Hospital, Queensland Health Coopers Plains Queensland Australia

5. School of Nursing and Midwifery Griffith University Brisbane Queensland Australia

6. Children's Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service Brisbane Queensland Australia

7. School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work The University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia

8. NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Wiser Wound Care Griffith University Gold Coast Queensland Australia

9. Herston Infectious Diseases Institute, Metro North Health Brisbane Queensland Australia

Abstract

AbstractAimTo explore the barriers and facilitators influencing emergency department clinicians' adherence to the Australian Peripheral Intravenous Catheter (PIVC) Clinical Care Standard, using the Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW).BackgroundSuboptimal PIVC practices are frequently linked to a range of patient‐important adverse outcomes. The first Australian Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Clinical Care Standard was introduced in 2021, aiming to standardize practice. However, a recent national survey revealed a lack of adherence to the Standard among emergency department clinicians.DesignA qualitative descriptive study.MethodThe study was conducted across two Australian emergency departments in 2023. Utilizing purposive sampling, semi‐structured interviews were conducted. The analysis incorporated both deductive and inductive approaches, mapping the findings to the BCW.FindingsInterviews with 25 nurses and doctors revealed nine key subthemes. The main barriers were the stressful environment, insufficient education and training, and the absence of a feedback mechanism. The main facilitators were recognition of suboptimal practice, belief in the importance of patient engagement, and the desire to improve practice.ConclusionMultiple complex factors have an impact on clinicians' adherence to the Standard. The identified interventions will serve as a guide for future implementation of the Standard.Implications for the Profession and Patient CareThe findings inform healthcare organizations of the significance of implementing strategies to enhance clinicians' acceptance of the Standard. Clinicians should consider incorporating the multifaceted interventions developed in accordance with the BCW for future implementation projects.ImpactPromoting adherence to standards opens avenues to challenge suboptimal practice and has the potential to instigate a culture shift in the fundamental skills of frontline clinicians.Reporting MethodThe study is designed and reported according to the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist.Patient or Public ContributionNo patient or public contribution.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference49 articles.

1. AIHW. (2023a).Emergency Department Care.https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports‐data/myhospitals/sectors/emergency‐department‐care

2. AIHW. (2023b).Time spent in emergency departments 2012–13 to 2021–h22.https://viz.aihw.gov.au/t/Public/views/2EDAccessBrickUDMTimeinEmergencyDepartments/Table?%3Aembed=y&%3Ahighdpi=false&%3Arender%3Afalse=&%3Atoolbar=n&%3Atabs=n&%3Adisplay_count=n&%3AshowVizHome=n&%3Aorigin=viz_share_link

3. Use of Short Peripheral Intravenous Catheters: Characteristics, Management, and Outcomes Worldwide

4. Evaluating an ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous cannulation training program for emergency clinicians: An Australian perspective

5. Individual versus group feedback in cooperative groups;Archer‐Kath J.;The Journal of Social Psychology,1994

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3