Comparing the effectiveness of molnupiravir and nirmatrelvir‐ritonavir in non‐hospitalized and hospitalized COVID‐19 patients with type 2 diabetes: A target trial emulation study

Author:

Wan Eric Y. F.123ORCID,Wong Zoey C. T.3,Yan Vincent K. C.1,Chui Celine S. L.245,Lai Francisco T. T.123,Li Xue126,Wong Ian C. K.127,Chan Esther W. Y.1289

Affiliation:

1. Centre for Safe Medication Practice and research, Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region China

2. Laboratory of Data Discovery for Health (D24H), Hong Kong Science and Technology Park Hong Kong Special Administrative Region China

3. Department of Family Medicine and Primary Care, School of Clinical Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region China

4. School of Nursing, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region China

5. School of Public Health, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region China

6. Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region China

7. Aston Pharmacy School Aston University Birmingham UK

8. Department of Pharmacy The University of Hong Kong‐Shenzhen Hospital Shenzhen China

9. The University of Hong Kong Shenzhen Institute of Research and Innovation Shenzhen China

Abstract

AbstractAimsTo compare the effectiveness of molnupiravir and nirmatrelvir‐ritonavir for non‐hospitalized and hospitalized COVID‐19 patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM).Materials and MethodsTerritory‐wide electronic health records in Hong Kong were used to perform target trial emulation using a sequential trial approach. Patients (1) aged ≥18 years, (2) with T2DM, (3) with COVID‐19 infection, and (4) who received molnupiravir or nirmatrelvir‐ritonavir within 5 days of infection between 16 March 2022 and 31 December 2022 in non‐hospital and hospital settings were included. Molnupiravir and nirmatrelvir‐ritonavir initiators were matched using one‐to‐one propensity‐score matching and followed for 28 days. Risk of outcomes was compared between groups by Cox regression adjusted for baseline characteristics. Subgroup analyses were performed on age (<70 years, ≥70 years), sex, Charlson comorbidity index (<4, ≥4), and number of COVID‐19 vaccine doses (<2 doses, ≥2 doses).ResultsTotals of 17 974 non‐hospitalized (8987 in each group) and 3678 hospitalized (1839 in each group) patients were identified. Non‐hospitalized nirmatrelvir‐ritonavir initiators had lower risk of all‐cause mortality (absolute risk reduction [ARR] at 28 days 0.80%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.56–1.04; hazard ratio [HR] 0.47, 95% CI 0.30–0.73) and hospitalization (ARR at 28 days 4.01%, 95% CI 3.19–4.83; HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.66–0.82) as compared with molnupiravir initiators. Hospitalized nirmatrelvir‐ritonavir initiators had reduced risk of all‐cause mortality (ARR at 28 days 2.94%, 95% CI 1.65–4.23; HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.40–0.80) as compared with molnupiravir initiators. Consistent findings were found across all subgroups.ConclusionsThe use of nirmatrelvir‐ritonavir may be preferred to molnupiravir for COVID‐19 patients with T2DM and without contraindication to either treatment.

Funder

Health and Medical Research Fund

University Grants Committee

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3