Operationalising children's participation: Competing understandings of the policy to practice ‘gap’

Author:

Michail Samia123ORCID,Baird Kelly2345ORCID,Fattore Tobia6ORCID,Grace Rebekah23ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Social Sciences Western Sydney University Liverpool New South Wales Australia

2. Transforming Early Education And Child Health (TeEACH) Research Centre Western Sydney University Liverpool New South Wales Australia

3. Translational Health Research Institute (THRI) Western Sydney University Liverpool New South Wales Australia

4. Translational Research and Social Innovation (TReSI), School of Nursing & Midwifery Western Sydney University Liverpool New South Wales Australia

5. Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research Western Sydney University Liverpool New South Wales Australia

6. School of Social Sciences Macquarie University North Ryde New South Wales Australia

Abstract

AbstractThere is widespread discourse and policy on children's participation in decision‐making. This is not matched with an equal level of implementation in practice. This qualitative research explores the policy to practice gap with senior decision makers in the child protection system in New South Wales (NSW), Australia. Their reflections on the challenges associated with translating the participation principles into practice are deconstructed to understand the complex and overlapping ways in which participation is perceived. The research data indicate there are competing understandings of participation at play, depending on the actor, their role and organisation. This paper suggests that genuine participation in practice relies on bridging the epistemic differences and interests of different stakeholder groups who are all critical to achieving children's participation in service decision‐making.

Funder

Australian Research Council

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Life-span and Life-course Studies,Education,Health (social science)

Reference66 articles.

1. Australian Child Rights Taskforce. (2011)Listen to children—child rights NGO report Australia.https://yla.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/PUB-2011-Listen-to-Children-Report.pdf

2. Australian Government. (2017).Royal Commission into institutional responses to child sexual abuse final report recommendations.https://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/sites/default/files/final_report_‐_recommendations.pdf

3. Trauma-informed care as a rights-based “standard of care”: A critical review

4. Social Work and Advocacy with Young People: Rights and Care in Practice

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3