Post‐cardiotomy extracorporeal life support: A cohort of cannulation in the general ward

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesPost‐cardiotomy extracorporeal life support (ECLS) cannulation might occur in a general post‐operative ward due to emergent conditions. Its characteristics have been poorly reported and investigated This study investigates the characteristics and outcomes of adult patients receiving ECLS cannulation in a general post‐operative cardiac ward.MethodsThe Post‐cardiotomy Extracorporeal Life Support (PELS) is a retrospective (2000–2020), multicenter (34 centers), observational study including adult patients who required ECLS for post‐cardiotomy shock. This PELS sub‐analysis analyzed patients´ characteristics, in‐hospital outcomes, and long‐term survival in patients cannulated for veno‐arterial ECLS in the general ward, and further compared in‐hospital survivors and non‐survivors.ResultsThe PELS study included 2058 patients of whom 39 (1.9%) were cannulated in the general ward. Most patients underwent isolated coronary bypass grafting (CABG, n = 15, 38.5%) or isolated non‐CABG operations (n = 20, 51.3%). The main indications to initiate ECLS included cardiac arrest (n = 17, 44.7%) and cardiogenic shock (n = 14, 35.9%). ECLS cannulation occurred after a median time of 4 (2–7) days post‐operatively. Most patients' courses were complicated by acute kidney injury (n = 23, 59%), arrhythmias (n = 19, 48.7%), and postoperative bleeding (n = 20, 51.3%). In‐hospital mortality was 84.6% (n = 33) with persistent heart failure (n = 11, 28.2%) as the most common cause of death. No peculiar differences were observed between in‐hospital survivors and nonsurvivors.ConclusionsThis study demonstrates that ECLS cannulation due to post‐cardiotomy emergent adverse events in the general ward is rare, mainly occurring in preoperative low‐risk patients and after a postoperative cardiac arrest. High complication rates and low in‐hospital survival require further investigations to identify patients at risk for such a complication, optimize resources, enhance intervention, and improve outcomes.