Trends in the use of local intervention for metastatic hormone‐naïve prostate cancer: A multicenter retrospective study

Abstract

ObjectiveTo evaluated the trends of local intervention and their impact on oncological outcomes in metastatic hormone‐naïve prostate cancer (mHNPC) in real‐world practice.MethodsThis retrospective multicenter study included 760 patients treated with either androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) without local treatment (no castration‐resistant prostate cancer [CRPC] progression within 12 months, control group) or ADT plus local intervention (intervention group) between January 2005 and March 2022. We evaluated the trends in the use of local intervention in patients with mHNPC and factors associated with CRPC‐free survival in the intervention group.ResultsThe use of local intervention gradually increased in combination with upfront combination treatment (docetaxel or androgen receptor axis‐targeted agents) for the duration of our study. The number of patients with local intervention combined with upfront treatment was significantly higher in patients with high tumor burden disease than in those with low tumor burden disease. Of the 108 patients who received local intervention, a duration of ≤7 months of initial therapy before local intervention and a level of prostate‐specific antigen ≥0.20 ng/mL at the time of local intervention were significantly associated with poor CRPC‐free survival.ConclusionsThe use of local intervention in combination with upfront therapy to treat mHNPC increased for the duration of our study regardless of the tumor burden. Local intervention in addition to the standard of care for mHNPC may be a feasible treatment option for selected patients, taking into consideration the duration of and response to initial treatment.