Contact sensitisation in oral lichen planus: An Australian perspective

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThe role of contact sensitisation in the pathogenesis of oral lichen planus (OLP) has not been clearly defined.ObjectiveWe aimed to evaluate relevant contact sensitisers in OLP.MethodsA retrospective study was conducted on OLP patients who underwent patch testing from 1 January 2006 to 31 December 2020 at an Australian tertiary dermatology institution, compared to cheilitis patients patch tested over the same time period.ResultsNinety‐six OLP patients and 152 cheilitis patients were patch tested during the 15‐year period. Seventy‐one (73.9%) OLP patients and 100 (65.8%) cheilitis patients recorded one or more relevant reactions. Forty‐three (44.8%), 22 (22.9%), 21 (21.9%) and 17 (17.7%) OLP patients had relevant reactions to mercury‐related chemicals, amalgam, spearmint and carvone, respectively, compared to 6 (3.9%), 3 (2.0%), 4 (2.6%) and 0 (0%) cheilitis patients, respectively (p‐value <0.001 each). Four (4.2%) OLP patients had relevant positive reactions to sodium metabisulfite, compared to none in the cheilitis group (p‐value 0.021).ConclusionWhile dental amalgam is used less frequently these days, we report that mercury (found in amalgam) and additionally spearmint and carvone are relevant sensitisers in OLP in Australia. Sodium metabisulfite may also be a relevant sensitiser in OLP, which has not previously been reported.