Beyond the hype: A critical appraisal of the limitations and misconceptions of systematic reviews in the Oral pathology and medicine field

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundSystematic reviews (SRs) have become a popular approach for evidence‐based practice, being considered a lens through which evidence is viewed and applied. However, several published studies have been identified as scoping reviews rather than SRs. This methodological error can negatively impact clinical decision‐making or new research conceptualization.AimThis letter focuses on the increasing number of SRs in oral pathology and medicine, highlighting the most frequent methodological mistakes.ResultsWe providing general guidance to help researchers conceptualize better their SRs and for the critical evaluation of SRs by scientific journal reviewers.ConclusionClinicians, pathologists, and reviewers, must ensure the quality of the published information.