The Suicide Dot Probe Task: Psychometric properties and validity in relation to suicide‐related outcomes

Author:

Rogers Megan L.1ORCID,Carosa Catarina L.2ORCID,Haliczer Lauren A.3,Hughes Christopher D.45ORCID,Schofield Casey A.6,Armey Michael F.45

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology Texas State University San Marcos Texas USA

2. Department of Psychology and Neuroscience Duke University Durham North Carolina USA

3. Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA

4. Butler Hospital Providence Rhode Island USA

5. Alpert Medical School of Brown University Providence Rhode Island USA

6. Skidmore College Saratoga Springs New York USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundAttentional biases to suicide‐related stimuli have been linked to suicide‐related outcomes. However, behavioral tasks that have been previously modified to capture suicide‐specific attentional biases have demonstrated inconsistent reliability and validity. Adaptation of the Dot Probe Task, a computerized assessment that has been adapted to study a wide variety of biases, may be a promising candidate for assessing suicide‐specific biases.MethodsIn 280 recently discharged inpatients (51% male; Mage = 40.22 years), we evaluated the psychometric properties of a modified Suicide Dot Probe Task. Participants completed this task and assessments of suicidal thoughts and behaviors at baseline and 6‐month follow‐up.ResultsThe Suicide Dot Probe Task demonstrated poor‐to‐moderate internal consistency and poor test‐retest reliability, and participant response times were slower to suicide‐specific and dysphoric stimuli than positive stimuli. However, there were no differences based on the presence or characteristics of recent or lifetime suicidal ideation or attempts. Participants' suicide‐specific biases were not predictive of suicidal ideation or attempts at follow‐up.ConclusionsThe Suicide Dot Probe Task exhibited questionable reliability, and differences in attentional biases were not associated with suicidal ideation or attempts. This study contributes to a body of research demonstrating the questionable utility of several behavioral tasks to study suicide‐specific attentional biases.

Funder

National Institute of Mental Health

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Clinical Psychology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3