Molecular communication between red blood cells of different phenotypes during blood storage in mice

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThe cellular and molecular changes during red blood cell (RBC) storage that affect posttransfusion recovery (PTR) remain incompletely understood. We have previously reported that RBCs of different storage biology cross‐regulate each other when stored together (co‐storage cross‐regulation [CSCR]). However, the mechanism of CSCR is unclear. In the current study, we tested the hypothesis that CSCR involves acquisition of molecular signatures associated with PTR.Study Design and MethodsThe whole blood compartment of either B6 or FVB mice was biotinylated in vivo prior to blood collection and storage. Bio‐B6 or Bio.FVB were stored with RBCs from B6 mice transgenic for green florescent protein (GFP) (B6.GFP). After storage, avidin‐magnetic beads were used to simultaneous purify Bio‐RBCs (positive selection) and B6.GFPs (negative selection). Isolated populations were analyzed by transfusion to establish PTR, and subjected to metabolomic and proteomic analysis.ResultsB6 RBCs acquired molecular signatures associated with stored FVB RBCs at both the metabolomic and proteomic level including metabolites associated with energy metabolism, oxidative stress regulation, and oxidative damage. Mitochondrial signatures were also acquired by B6 RBCs. Protein signatures acquired by B6 RBCs include proteins associated with vesiculation.ConclusionThe data presented herein demonstrate the appearance of multiple molecular changes from poor‐storing RBCs in good‐storing RBCs during co‐storage. Whether this is a result of damage causing intrinsic molecular changes in B6 RBCs or if molecules of FVB RBC origin are transferred to B6 RBCs remains unclear. These studies broaden our mechanistic understanding of RBC storage (in particular) and potentially RBC biology (in general).