A qualitative study assessing allied health provider perceptions of telepractice functionality in therapy delivery for people with disability

Author:

Benz Cloe1ORCID,Dantas Jaya1ORCID,Welsh Mai2ORCID,Norman Richard1ORCID,Robinson Suzanne13ORCID,Hendrie Delia1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Population Health Curtin University Bentley Western Australia Australia

2. Rocky Bay Mosman Park Western Australia Australia

3. Deakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation Deakin University Melbourne Victoria Australia

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionTelepractice service delivery of allied health interventions to people with disability can potentially reduce access barriers and improve service equity. However, questions remain regarding telepractice functionality for people with disability. This study addressed questions related to how allied health clinicians and managers perceive telepractice as functioning in the provision of therapy services to people with disability.MethodsThirteen interviews of allied health clinicians and managers from across Australia were conducted between 21 November and 22 February via MS teams. Qualitative methodology and critical realist theoretical paradigm underpin the study. Data analysis was completed using a reflective thematic analysis method and five themes were generated and described utilising an analytic metaphor.ResultsThe study themes were described in relation to a shopping for shoes analytic metaphor and the five themes included (1) a shoe for every foot, (2) planned purchases, (3) shoe on the other foot, (4) you need both shoes and (5) help choosing their shoes. In summary, the function of telepractice fits differently for each individual, similar to pairs of shoes.ConclusionsTelepractice has its own strengths and weaknesses and isn't a direct substitute for in‐person sessions, much like left and right shoes are similar but not the same. The results support participant perceptions that telepractice functions best as an adjunct to in‐person sessions through a flexible hybrid delivery model in the provision of therapy services to people with a disability. A strategy for improving perceived usefulness may involve positioning telepractice as unique with strengths and weaknesses, not replacing in‐person care.Patient or Public ContributionThe paper forms part of a larger codesign process which included customer and carer participants throughout the design and planning of the project, inclusion of a peer researcher, and the selection of the analytic metaphor including in the findings of this article production.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference45 articles.

1. National Disability Insurance Agency. What is the NDIS?2021. Accessed August 14 2021.https://www.ndis.gov.au/understanding/what-ndis

2. National Disability Insurance Agency. Allied Health Providers.2022. Accessed September 22 2022.https://www.ndis.gov.au/providers/working-provider/allied-health-providers

3. National Disability Insurance Agency. NDIS price guides and pricing Australia.2021. Accessed June 21 2021.https://www.ndis.au/govproviders/price-guides-and-pricing

4. National Disability Insurance Agency. Pricing update and more support for participant choice and control.2019. Accessed May 9 2023.https://www.ndis.gov.au/news/1997-pricing-update-and-more-support-participant-choice-and-control

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3