Impact of an artificial intelligence‐aided endoscopic diagnosis system on improving endoscopy quality for trainees in colonoscopy: Prospective, randomized, multicenter study

Author:

Yamaguchi Daisuke12ORCID,Shimoda Ryo3,Miyahara Koichi4,Yukimoto Takahiro2,Sakata Yasuhisa2,Takamori Ayako5,Mizuta Yumi1,Fujimura Yutaro4,Inoue Suma4,Tomonaga Michito2,Ogino Yuya4,Eguchi Kohei4,Ikeda Kei1,Tanaka Yuichiro1,Takedomi Hironobu2,Hidaka Hidenori4,Akutagawa Takashi3,Tsuruoka Nanae2,Noda Takahiro4,Tsunada Seiji1,Esaki Motohiro2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Gastroenterology National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center Ureshino Japan

2. Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Saga University Saga Japan

3. Department of Endoscopic Diagnostics and Therapeutics Saga University Hospital Saga Japan

4. Department of Internal Medicine Karatsu Red Cross Hospital Saga Japan

5. Clinical Research Center Saga University Hospital Saga Japan

Abstract

ObjectiveThis study was performed to evaluate whether the use of CAD EYE (Fujifilm, Tokyo, Japan) for colonoscopy improves colonoscopy quality in gastroenterology trainees.MethodsThe patients in this multicenter randomized controlled trial were divided into Group A (observation using CAD EYE) and Group B (standard observation). Six trainees performed colonoscopies using a back‐to‐back method in pairs with gastroenterology experts. The primary end‐point was the trainees' adenoma detection rate (ADR), and the secondary end‐points were the trainees' adenoma miss rate (AMR) and Assessment of Competency in Endoscopy (ACE) tool scores. Each trainee's learning curve was evaluated using a cumulative sum (CUSUM) control chart.ResultsWe analyzed data for 231 patients (Group A, n = 113; Group B, n = 118). The ADR was not significantly different between the two groups. Group A had a significantly lower AMR (25.6% vs. 38.6%, P = 0.033) and number of missed adenomas per patient (0.5 vs. 0.9, P = 0.004) than Group B. Group A also had significantly higher ACE tool scores for pathology identification (2.26 vs. 2.07, P = 0.030) and interpretation and identification of pathology location (2.18 vs. 2.00, P = 0.038). For the CUSUM learning curve, Group A showed a trend toward a lower number of cases of missed multiple adenomas by the six trainees.ConclusionCAD EYE did not improve ADR but decreased the AMR and improved the ability to accurately locate and identify colorectal adenomas. CAD EYE can be assumed to be beneficial for improving colonoscopy quality in gastroenterology trainees.Trial registrationUniversity Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000044031).

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Gastroenterology,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cited by 17 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3