Supported decision‐making interventions in mental healthcare: A systematic review of current evidence and implementation barriers

Author:

Francis Cathy J.1ORCID,Johnson Amanda2ORCID,Wilson Rhonda L.13ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Newcastle Newcastle New South Wales Australia

2. Head of School, Dean of Nursing and Midwifery University of Newcastle Newcastle New South Wales Australia

3. Massey University Palmerston North New Zealand

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThere is a growing momentum around the world to foster greater opportunities for the involvement of mental health service users in their care and treatment planning. In‐principle support for this aim is widespread across mental healthcare professionals. Yet, progress in mental health services towards this objective has lagged in practice.ObjectivesWe conducted a systematic review of quantitative, qualitative and mixed‐method research on interventions to improve opportunities for the involvement of mental healthcare service users in treatment planning, to understand the current research evidence and the barriers to implementation.MethodsSeven databases were searched and 5137 articles were screened. Articles were included if they reported on an intervention for adult service users, were published between 2008 and October 2023 and were in English. Evidence in the 140 included articles was synthesised according to the JBI guidance on Mixed Methods Systematic Reviews.ResultsResearch in this field remains exploratory in nature, with a wide range of interventions investigated to date but little experimental replication. Overarching barriers to shared and supported decision‐making in mental health treatment planning were (1) Organisational (resource limitations, culture barriers, risk management priorities and structure); (2) Process (lack of knowledge, time constraints, health‐related concerns, problems completing and using plans); and (3) Relationship barriers (fear and distrust for both service users and clinicians).ConclusionsOn the basis of the barriers identified, recommendations are made to enable the implementation of new policies and programs, the designing of new tools and for clinicians seeking to practice shared and supported decision‐making in the healthcare they offer.Patient or Public ContributionThis systematic review has been guided at all stages by a researcher with experience of mental health service use, who does not wish to be identified at this point in time. The findings may inform organisations, researchers and practitioners on implementing supported decision‐making, for the greater involvement of people with mental ill health in their healthcare.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference116 articles.

1. United Nations. Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities.2022. Accessed December 7 2022.https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/convention-rights-persons-disabilities

2. KokanovicR BrophyL McSherryB et al. Options for supported decision‐making to enhance the recovery of speople experiencing severe mental health problems. Melbourne: Melbourne Social Equity Institute University of Melbourne.2017.

3. Embedding shared decision-making in the care of patients with severe and enduring mental health problems: The EQUIP pragmatic cluster randomised trial

4. Psychiatric Advance Directives as a complex and multistage intervention: a realist systematic review

5. Implementing shared decision making in routine mental health care

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3