Survival outcomes for patients with colorectal cancer with synchronous liver only metastasis

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundColorectal cancer with synchronous liver‐only metastasis is managed with a multimodal approach, however, optimal sequencing of modalities remains unclear.MethodsA retrospective review of all consecutive rectal or colon cancer cases with synchronous liver‐only metastasis was conducted from the South Australian Colorectal Cancer Registry from 2006 to 2021. This study aimed to investigate how order and type of treatment modality affects overall survival.ResultsData of over 5000 cases were analysed (n = 5244), 1420 cases had liver‐only metastasis. There were a greater number of colon than rectal primaries (N = 1056 versus 364). Colonic resection was the preferred initial treatment for the colon cohort (60%). In the rectal cohort, 30% had upfront resection followed by 27% that had chemo‐radiotherapy as 1st line therapy. For the colon cohort, there was an improved 5‐year survival with surgical resection as initial treatment compared to chemotherapy (25% versus 9%, P < 0.001). In the rectal cohort, chemo‐radiotherapy as the initial treatment was associated with an improved 5‐year survival compared to surgery or chemotherapy (40% versus 26% versus 19%, P = 0.0015). Patients who were able to have liver resection had improved survival, with 50% surviving over 5 years compared to 12 months in the non‐resected group (P < 0.001). Primary rectal KRAS wildtype patients who underwent liver resection and received Cetuximab had significantly worse outcomes compared to KRAS wildtype patients who did not (P = 0.0007).ConclusionsWhere surgery is possible, resection of liver metastasis and primary tumour improved overall survival. Further research is required on the use of targeted treatments in patients undergoing liver resection.