Comparison of BlockBuster laryngeal mask with Air‐Q intubating laryngeal airway as a conduit for fiber‐optic guided intubation in children: A prospective randomized controlled study

Author:

Soni Lipika1ORCID,Kumar Kanil Ranjith1ORCID,Sinha Renu1,Ayub Arshad1ORCID,Patel Nishant1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anaesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Critical Care All India Institute of Medical Sciences New Delhi India

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThe pediatric sizes of BlockBuster supraglottic airway (SGA) have been introduced recently. Its efficacy as a conduit for endotracheal intubation in children has not been assessed. Newer devices are often compared with Air‐Q SGA to assess their intubating capability.AimsThe primary objective was to compare the time taken for fiber‐optic‐guided intubation through the BlockBuster and the Air‐Q SGAs.MethodsSixty children aged 6 months to 12 years with normal airways were randomized into two groups: Air‐Q SGA (Group A) and Blockbuster SGA (Group B). After administration of general anesthesia, an appropriately sized SGA was inserted. The time taken for fiber‐optic‐guided intubation through the SGA, success, ease, and time for SGA insertion and removal were noted. The glottic view was graded by fiber‐optic bronchoscopy.ResultsDemographic parameters were comparable. The time to intubate with the BlockBuster 62.40 ± 17.2 s was comparable to the Air‐Q 60.8 ± 18.5 s (mean difference 1.6 s, 95% CI −7.65 to10.85; p = .73). The average time for SGA insertion in BlockBuster and Air‐Q was 14.57 ± 3.2 s and 16.67 ± 5.39 s, respectively (mean difference −2.1, 95% CI −4.39 to 0.19 s; p = .07). The first‐attempt intubation success and overall intubation success rates were comparable in both groups, 96.7% and 100%, respectively. In Group B, 25/3/1/1/0 cases had a glottic view grade of 1/2/3/4/5, respectively. In Group A, 23/3/2/2/0 cases had grade of 1/2/3/4/5 glottic views respectively. The average time to SGA removal was comparable between the BlockBuster (20.17 ± 5.8 s) and the Air‐Q (22.5 ± 12.8 s) groups (mean difference −2.3 s, 95% CI −7.5 to 2.82 s; p = .37). None of the children had any perioperative complications.ConclusionBlockBuster SGA may be a useful alternative to Air‐Q for SGA‐assisted, fiber‐optic‐guided tracheal intubation in children.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3