Von Willebrand factor for outcome prediction within different clinical stages of advanced chronic liver disease

Author:

Dominik Nina12ORCID,Scheiner Bernhard123ORCID,Zanetto Alberto4,Balcar Lorenz12ORCID,Semmler Georg12ORCID,Campello Elena5,Schwarz Michael12,Paternostro Rafael12ORCID,Simbrunner Benedikt126ORCID,Hofer Benedikt S.12ORCID,Stättermayer Albert Friedrich12,Pinter Matthias1ORCID,Trauner Michael1,Quehenberger Peter7,Simioni Paolo5,Reiberger Thomas123ORCID,Mandorfer Mattias12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine III, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria

2. Vienna Hepatic Hemodynamic Lab, Department of Medicine III, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria

3. Department of Surgery and Cancer Imperial College London London UK

4. Gastroenterology and Multivisceral Transplant Unit, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology Padova University Hospital Padova Italy

5. General Internal Medicine Unit, Thrombotic and Haemorrhagic Disease Unit and Haemophilia Center, Department of Medicine (DIMED) Padova University Hospital Padova Italy

6. Christian Doppler Laboratory for Portal Hypertension and Liver Fibrosis Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria

7. Department of Laboratory Medicine Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria

Abstract

SummaryBackground and AimsThe prognostic performance of von Willebrand factor (VWF) may vary across clinical stages of advanced chronic liver disease (ACLD). Therefore, we investigated the evolution of VWF and other biomarkers throughout the full ACLD spectrum and evaluated their stage‐specific prognostic utility.MethodsWe retrospectively included Viennese ACLD patients with available information on hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG), C‐reactive protein (CRP)/VWF levels and outcomes. ACLD stages were defined according to D'Amico et al. We included an external validation cohort from Padua.ResultsWe observed gradual increases in VWF throughout ACLD stages. In contrast, HVPG levelled off in decompensated ACLD (dACLD), whereas MELD showed only minor changes in the early stages and CRP did not increase until stage 3. VWF was associated with hepatic decompensation/liver‐related death in compensated ACLD (cACLD) in a fully adjusted model, while it was not independently predictive of ACLF/liver‐related death in dACLD. After backward selection, HVPG/CRP/VWF remained the main predictors of hepatic decompensation/liver‐related death in cACLD. Notably, the performance of the non‐invasive CRP/VWF‐based model was comparable to invasive HVPG‐based models (C‐index:0.765 ± 0.034 vs. 0.756 ± 0.040). The discriminative ability of the CRP/VWF‐based model was confirmed in an external validation cohort using another VWF assay which yielded systematically lower values.ConclusionVWF is the only biomarker that gradually increases across all ACLD stages. It is of particular prognostic value in cACLD, where a CRP/VWF‐based model is equivalent to an invasive HVPG‐based model. Systematic differences in VWF underline the importance of interlaboratory surveys. Moreover, our findings reinforce the notion that, already in cACLD, inflammation is a key disease‐driving mechanism.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3