Mucoadhesive delivery systems for oral candidiasis treatment: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Author:

Sugio Carolina Yoshi Campos12,Garcia Amanda Aparecida Maia Neves1,Kitamoto Klaryssa Akemi de Araujo12,Santiago Júnior Joel Ferreira3,Soares Simone1,Porto Vinicius Carvalho1,Urban Vanessa Migliorini4,Ferrari Priscileila Colerato5,Fernandes Maria Helena2,Neppelenbroek Karin Hermana1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontics, Bauru School of Dentistry University of São Paulo (USP) Bauru Brazil

2. BoneLab‐Laboratory for Bone Metabolism and Regeneration, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Associated Laboratory for Green Chemistry/Network of Chemistry and Technology (LAQV/REQUIMTE) University of Porto (UP) Porto Portugal

3. Department of Health Sciences Centro Universitário Sagrado Coração (UNISAGRADO) Bauru Brazil

4. Department of Dentistry State University of Ponta Grossa (UEPG) Ponta Grossa Brazil

5. Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences State University of Ponta Grossa (UEPG) Ponta Grossa Brazil

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesThis systematic review and meta‐analysis aimed to evaluate the clinical and mycological effectiveness of mucoadhesives as vehicles for drugs or natural products in the treatment of oral candidiasis.Materials and methodsThe search for articles was carried out in the Medline/PubMed, SCOPUS, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and SciELO databases before August 2023. We selected the studies, extracted the data, evaluated the study quality, graded the evidence, performed the risk of bias, and carried out meta‐analysis.ResultsA total of 389 potentially relevant articles were identified, and 11 studies (1869 participants) met the inclusion criteria of the systematic review. The overall risk of bias was considered low. The most common presentation of mucoadhesives was tablets, with miconazole being the most frequently drug used in the delivery system. Mucoadhesives demonstrated comparable efficacy with topical or systemic antifungal agents, with no significant differences between treatments in terms of clinical (RR = 0.907; 95CI = 0.3–1.297; p = 0.591; I2 = 64.648) or mycological (RR = 0.95; 95CI = 0.667–1.360; p = 0.789; I2 = 73.271) efficacy.ConclusionsMucoadhesives may be a suitable alternative to conventional treatments, with the advantage of reducing the frequency of application by up to 5 times and the daily dosage by up to 20 times.

Funder

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3