Towards a partnership of teachers and intelligent learning technology: A systematic literature review of model‐based learning analytics

Author:

Ley Tobias12ORCID,Tammets Kairit2,Pishtari Gerti1ORCID,Chejara Pankaj2,Kasepalu Reet2,Khalil Mohammad3ORCID,Saar Merike2,Tuvi Iiris4,Väljataga Terje2,Wasson Barbara3

Affiliation:

1. Center for Digitalization in Lifelong Learning University for Continuing Education Krems Krems an der Donau Austria

2. Center for Educational Technology Tallinn University Tallinn Estonia

3. Centre for the Science of Learning & Technology (SLATE) University of Bergen Bergen Norway

4. Institute of Psychology University of Tartu Tartu Estonia

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundWith increased use of artificial intelligence in the classroom, there is now a need to better understand the complementarity of intelligent learning technology and teachers to produce effective instruction.ObjectiveThe paper reviews the current research on intelligent learning technology designed to make models of student learning and instruction transparent to teachers, an area we call model‐based learning analytics. We intended to gain an insight into the coupling between the knowledge models that underpin the intelligent system and the knowledge used by teachers in their classroom decision making.MethodsUsing a systematic literature review methodology, we first identified 42 papers, mainly from the domain of intelligent tutoring systems and learning analytics dashboards that conformed to our selection criteria. We then qualitatively analysed the context in which the systems were applied, models they used and benefits reported for teachers and learners.Results and ConclusionsA majority of papers used either domain or learner models, suggesting that instructional decisions are mostly left to teachers. Compared to previous reviews, our set of papers appeared to have a stronger focus on providing teachers with theory‐driven insights and instructional decisions. This suggests that model‐based learning analytics can address some of the shortcomings of the field, like meaningfulness and actionability of learning analytics tools. However, impact in the classroom still needs further research, as in half of the cases the reported benefits were not backed with evidence. Future research should focus on the dynamic interaction between teachers and technology and how learning analytics has an impact on learning and decision making by teachers and students. We offer a taxonomy of knowledge models that can serve as a starting point for designing such interaction.

Funder

Eesti Teadusagentuur

H2020 Spreading Excellence and Widening Participation

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Computer Science Applications,Education

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3