Trends and motivations for freebirth: A scoping review

Author:

Shorey Shefaly1ORCID,Jarašiūnaitė‐Fedosejeva Gabija2,Akik Burcu Kömürcü3,Holopainen Annaleena4,Isbir Gozde Gokce5ORCID,Chua Jing Shi1ORCID,Wayt Carly6,Downe Soo7ORCID,Lalor Joan6

Affiliation:

1. Alice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine National University of Singapore Singapore Singapore

2. Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences Vytautas Magnus university Kaunas Lithuania

3. Department of Psychology, Faculty of Languages and History‐Geography Ankara University Ankara Turkey

4. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands

5. Mersin University Midwifery Department Mersin Universitesi İçel Sağlık Yüksekokulu Ebelik bölümü Çiftlikköy Turkey

6. Trinity College Dublin School of Nursing and Midwifery Dublin 2 Ireland

7. School of Community Health and Midwifery University of Central Lancashire Preston UK

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundEven when maternity care facilities are available, some women will choose to give birth unassisted by a professional (freebirth). This became more apparent during the pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19), as women were increasingly concerned they would contract the virus in health care facilities. Several studies have identified the factors that influence women to seek alternative places of birth to hospitals, but research focusing specifically on freebirth is limited.MethodsEight databases were searched from their respective inception dates to April 2022 for studies related to freebirth. Data from the studies were charted and a thematic analysis was subsequently conducted.ResultsFour themes were identified based on findings from the 25 included studies: (1) Geographical and socio‐demographic determinants influencing freebirth, (2) Reasons for choosing freebirth, (3) Factors hindering freebirth, and (4) Preparation for and varied experiences of freebirth.DiscussionMore women chose to give birth unassisted in low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs) compared with high‐income countries (HICs). Overall, motivation for freebirth included previous negative birth experiences with health care professionals, a desire to adhere to their birth‐related beliefs, and fear of contracting the COVID‐19 virus. Included studies reported that study participants were often met with negative responses when they revealed that they were planning to freebirth. Most women in the included studies had positive freebirth experiences. Future research should explore the different motivators of freebirth present in LMICs or HICs to help inform effective policies that may improve birth experiences while maintaining safety.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3