Development and testing of a decision aid to achieve shared decision‐making for routine labor induction

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThis quality improvement project aimed to create a decision aid for labor induction in healthy pregnancies at or beyond 39 weeks that met the needs of pregnant people least likely to experience shared decision‐making and to identify and test implementation strategies to support its use in prenatal care.MethodsWe used quality improvement and qualitative methods to develop, test, and refine a patient decision aid. The decision aid was tested in three languages by providers across obstetrics, family medicine, and midwifery practices at a tertiary care hospital and two community health centers. Outcomes included patients' understanding of their choices, pros and cons of choices, and the decision being theirs or a shared one with their provider.ResultsPatient interview data indicated that shared decision‐making on labor induction was achieved. Across three Plan‐Do‐Study‐Act cycles, we interviewed a diverse group of 24 pregnant people: 20 were people of color, 16 were publicly insured, and 15 were born outside the United States. All but one (23/24) reported feeling the decision was theirs or a shared one with their provider. The majority could name induction choices they had along with pros and cons. Interviewees described the decision‐making experience as empowering and positive. Nine medical providers tested the decision aid and gave feedback. Providers stated the tool helped improve the quality of their counseling and reduce bias.ConclusionThis project suggests that using an evidence‐based and well‐tested decision aid can help achieve shared decision‐making on labor induction for a diverse group of pregnant people.