What is known about midwives' well‐being and resilience? An integrative review of the international literature

Author:

Moran Lynnelle1ORCID,Foster Kim1ORCID,Bayes Sara12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Australian Catholic University Fitzroy Victoria Australia

2. Edith Cowan University Joondalup Western Australia Australia

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundInternationally, the midwifery workforce is facing a professional crisis due to numerous organizational and individual factors that have led to midwives leaving the profession. These factors include high levels of workplace stress, systemic barriers to providing woman and person‐centered care, trauma, and burnout. The COVID‐19 pandemic magnified these pre‐existing stressors and adversities and has further disrupted midwives' ability to practice within their professional norms. In order to understand how midwives can be better supported, there is a need to understand what contributes to and detracts from their well‐being and resilience.AimTo investigate and synthesize the extant international knowledge on midwives' well‐being and resilience in the context of workplace stress and adversity.MethodIntegrative review of the literature published in peer‐reviewed journals.ResultsThematic analysis of the literature resulted in three core themes: (1) risk factors and adversity; (2) protective factors and resilience; and (3) sustaining factors and well‐being in midwifery. Findings from this integrated review highlight that several factors associated with workplace adversity can also be sources of protection depending on their presence or absence. Within the included studies, there exists a broad use of concepts and definitions that are applied to well‐being and resilience, resulting in a lack of uniformity and cohesion.ConclusionsIn this review, we identified a high level of workplace adversity and the subsequent impacts on midwives' well‐being and resilience. A series of protective factors and strategies that can be used to improve the well‐being of midwives and support resilience within the profession were also identified; however, further research of the population is required. In addition, the development of cohesive well‐being and resilience concepts specific to midwifery is recommended, as is the development and application of uniform terminologies and definitions.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Reference38 articles.

1. Prevalence, Related Factors, and Levels of Burnout Among Midwives: A Systematic Review

2. Prevalence of burnout, depression, anxiety and stress in Australian midwives: a cross-sectional survey

3. What factors affect the emotional well‐being of newly qualified midwives in their first year of practice?;Bacchus A;MIDIRS Midwifery Digest,2017

4. Midwifery workplace culture in Australia: A national survey of midwives

5. Understanding resilience in the context of midwifery: a concept analysis;Clohessy N;Evid Based Midwifery,2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3