Long‐term efficacy and safety of a hyaluronic acid dermal filler based on Tri‐Hyal technology on restoration of midface volume

Author:

Kestemont Philippe1,Fanian Ferial2ORCID,Garcia Philippe3,Grand‐Vincent Anne4,Benadiba Laurent5,Delmar Henry1,Bodokh Isaac6,Brun Patrick6,Braccini Frédéric7,Desouches Christophe8,Paris Jérôme9,Nadra Karim2,Salomon Catherine10,Trevidic Patrick11

Affiliation:

1. MEDITI Center 90 Boulevard Francis Meiland, 06160 Juan‐les‐pins France

2. Laboratoires FILLMED 2‐4 Rue de Lisbonne 75008 Paris France

3. Clinique Rémusat 21 Rue de Rémusat 75016 Paris France

4. Private Practice 97 Avenue de Villiers 75017 Paris France

5. Private Practice 86 Avenue Foch 75116 Paris France

6. Private Dermatology Practice 109 Rue d'Antibes 06400 Cannes France

7. Private Aesthetic Surgery Practice 27 Boulevard Dubouchage 06000 Nice France

8. Private Plastic Surgery Practice 5 Boulevard Notre Dame 13006 Marseille France

9. Institut Euro‐méditerranéen de Médecine et Chirurgie Esthétique 13, rue Roux de Brignoles 13006 Marseille France

10. General Practitioner ACMS, 55 Rue Rouget de Lisle 92158 Suresnes cedex France

11. Private Plastic Surgery Practice 7 Rue de Sontay 75116 Paris France

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionArt Filler Volume (AFV) is a hyaluronic acid (HA)‐based filler formulated with “Tri‐Hyal” technology, a unique combination of three sizes of HA chains. This study assessed AFV efficacy and safety over 18 months when used to restore midface volume.MethodsDuring this open‐label study, a maximum of 1.8 mL AFV was injected into each cheek area on Day 0 (D0). Subjects were evaluated at D21, when, if necessary, a retouch could be performed (maximum 1.2 mL per cheek). Subjects were evaluated at seven follow‐up visits through to D540. The primary assessment was based on the evolution of the Medicis Midface Volume Scale (MMVS) grade on D21. Secondary outcomes were local and general adverse events, investigator‐ and subject‐assessed Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale scores and changes in self‐esteem.ResultsOf the 79 healthy Caucasians enrolled (mean age 54.8 years), 25 required a second injection. In the intention‐to‐treat population, mean overall MMVS scores improved significantly from D0 (3.2 ± 0.4) to D21 (1.8 ± 0.6) and D42 (1.7 ± 0.6) (all p < 0.0001). MMVS scores for each cheek also improved significantly, irrespective of retouch on D21: 22% of injections showed a persistent benefit at D540 without retouch. The most common adverse events were pain on palpation (19%), erythema (15%) and edema (13%); most were mild or moderate and resolved within 2 weeks.ConclusionAFV produces a sustained objective and subjective midface volume restoration in female and male subjects, often without retouching, and was well tolerated.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Dermatology

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3