Usefulness of risk scores and predictors of atrial fibrillation recurrence after elective electrical cardioversion

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionElectrical cardioversion (ECV) is a frequently used procedure for restoring sinus rhythm in atrial fibrillation (AF); however, the rate of recurrence is high. The identification of patients at high risk of recurrence could influence the decision‐making process. The present study evaluates the predictive value of risk scores in atrial fibrillation recurrence after elective electrical cardioversion.MethodsUnicentric, observational, and prospective study of adult patients who have undergone an elective ECV as rhythm control strategy between July 2017 and September 2022.ResultsFrom the 283 analyzed patients (mean age 63.95 ± 10.76212, 74.9% male); 99 had paroxysmal AF (35%) and 159 (59%) presented AF recurrence during a follow‐up of 6 months. In patients with post‐ECV AF recurrence, the period of time from diagnosis until the performance of the procedure was longer (393 ± 891 vs. 195 ± 527, p = .02). No paroxysmal AF (71.3% vs. 57.8%, p = .02) and LA dilatation with >40 mL/m2 (35.9% vs. 23.3%, p = .02) volumes were more frequent within these patients. AF recurrence was more frequent in patients who had previous ECV (HR = 1.32; 95% CI: 1.12–2.35; p = .01) and more than 1 shock to recover sinus rhythm (HR = 1.62; 95% CI: 1.07–1.63; p = .01). The SLAC, ALARMEc, ATLAS, and CAAP‐AF scores were statistically significant, although with a moderate predictive capacity for post‐ECV recurrence.ConclusionsRisk scores analyzed showed a modest value predicting AF recurrence after ECV. Previous ECV, and greater difficulty in restoring SR were independent predictors of recurrence.