Socio‐economic disadvantage and utilisation of labour epidural analgesia in Scotland: a population‐based study

Author:

Halliday L.1ORCID,Shaw M.2,Kyzayeva A.1,Lawlor D. A.34ORCID,Nelson S. M.51ORCID,Kearns R. J.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing University of Glasgow Glasgow UK

2. Department of Medical Physics NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde Glasgow UK

3. MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol Bristol UK

4. Population Health Sciences University of Bristol Bristol UK

5. National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol Bristol UK

Abstract

SummarySocio‐economic deprivation is associated with adverse maternal and childhood outcomes. Epidural analgesia, the gold standard for labour analgesia, may improve maternal well‐being. We assessed the association of socio‐economic status with utilisation of epidural analgesia and whether this differed when epidural analgesia was advisable for maternal safety. This was a population‐based study of NHS data for all women in labour in Scotland between 1 January 2007 and 23 October 2020, excluding elective caesarean sections. Socio‐economic status deciles were defined using the Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation. Medical conditions for which epidural analgesia is advisable for maternal safety (medical indications) and contraindications were defined according to national guidelines. Of 593,230 patients in labour, 131,521 (22.2%) received epidural analgesia. Those from the most deprived areas were 16% less likely to receive epidural analgesia than the most affluent (relative risk 0.84 [95%CI 0.82–0.85]), with the inter‐decile mean change in receiving epidural analgesia estimated at ‐2% ([95%CI ‐2.2% to ‐1.7%]). Among the 21,219 deliveries with a documented medical indication for epidural analgesia, the socio‐economic gradient persisted (relative risk 0.79 [95%CI 0.75–0.84], inter‐decile mean change in receiving epidural analgesia ‐2.5% [95%CI ‐3.1% to ‐2.0%]). Women in the most deprived areas with a medical indication for epidural analgesia were still less likely (absolute risk 0.23 [95%CI 0.22–0.24]) to receive epidural analgesia than women from the most advantaged decile without a medical indication (absolute risk 0.25 [95%CI 0.24–0.25]). Socio‐economic deprivation is associated with lower utilisation of epidural analgesia, even when epidural analgesia is advisable for maternal safety. Ensuring equitable access to an intervention that alleviates pain and potentially reduces adverse outcomes is crucial.

Funder

Royal Perth Hospital Medical Research Foundation

Wellbeing of Women

University of Bristol

Medical Research Council

Publisher

Wiley

Reference35 articles.

1. World Health Organization.WHO recommendations: intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience. 2018.https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241550215(accessed 08/12/2023).

2. Epidural versus non‐epidural or no analgesia for pain management in labour;Anim‐Somuah MSR;Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews,2018

3. Posttraumatic Stress Disorder after Vaginal Delivery at Primiparous Women

4. Obstetric pain correlates with postpartum depression symptoms: a pilot prospective observational study

5. Use of Labor Neuraxial Analgesia for Vaginal Delivery and Severe Maternal Morbidity

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3