Toward sustainable harvest strategies for marine fisheries that include recreational fishing

Author:

Fowler Ashley M.1ORCID,Dowling Natalie A.2ORCID,Lyle Jeremy M.3ORCID,Alós Josep4ORCID,Anderson Leif E.5,Cooke Steven J.6,Danylchuk Andy J.7ORCID,Ferter Keno8ORCID,Folpp Heath9,Hutt Clifford10,Hyder Kieran1112,Lew Daniel K.13ORCID,Lowry Michael B.14,Lynch Tim P.2,Meadows Nicholas1ORCID,Mugerza Estanis15,Nedreaas Kjell8ORCID,Garrone‐Neto Domingos16,Ochwada‐Doyle Faith A.1ORCID,Potts Warren1718ORCID,Records David19ORCID,Steinback Scott20,Strehlow Harry V.21ORCID,Tracey Sean R.3ORCID,Travis Michael D.19,Tsuboi Jun‐ichi22ORCID,Vølstad Jon Helge8ORCID,Chick Rowan C.14ORCID

Affiliation:

1. New South Wales Department of Primary Industries Sydney Institute of Marine Science Mosman New South Wales Australia

2. The Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) Oceans and Atmosphere Hobart Tasmania Australia

3. Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies University of Tasmania Hobart Tasmania Australia

4. Instituto Mediterráneo de Estudios Avanzados, IMEDEA (CSIC‐UIB) Spain

5. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Northwest Fisheries Science Center Seattle Washington USA

6. Department of Biology and Institute of Environmental and Interdisciplinary Science Carleton University Ottawa Ontario Canada

7. Department of Environmental Conservation University of Massachusetts Amherst Amherst Massachusetts USA

8. Institute of Marine Research Bergen Norway

9. New South Wales Department of Primary Industries Coffs Harbour New South Wales Australia

10. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) NOAA Fisheries Office of Sustainable Fisheries Silver Spring Maryland USA

11. Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas) Lowestoft UK

12. School of Environmental Sciences University of East Anglia Norwich UK

13. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Alaska Fisheries Science Center Seattle Washington USA

14. Port Stephens Fisheries Institute New South Wales Department of Primary Industries Taylors Beach New South Wales Australia

15. AZTI, Sustainable Fisheries Management Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA) Sukarrieta Spain

16. UNESP – Universidade Estadual Paulista, Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias do Vale do Ribeira, Laboratório de Ictiologia e Conservação de Peixes Neotropicais Registro Brazil

17. Department of Ichthyology and Fisheries Science Rhodes University Makhanda South Africa

18. South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity (SAIAB) Makhanda South Africa

19. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Southeast Regional Office St. Petersburg Florida USA

20. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Northeast Fisheries Science Center Woods Hole Massachusetts USA

21. Thünen Institute of Baltic Sea Fisheries Rostock Germany

22. Research Center for Freshwater Fisheries Japan Fisheries Research and Education Agency Nikko Japan

Abstract

AbstractRecreational fishing (RF) is a large yet undervalued component of fisheries globally. While progress has been made in monitoring, assessing, and managing the sector in isolation, integration of RF into the management of multi‐sector fisheries has been limited, particularly relative to the commercial sector. This marginalises recreational fishers and reduces the likelihood of achieving the sector's objectives and, more broadly, achieving fisheries sustainability. We examined the nature and extent of RF inclusion in harvest strategies (HSs) for marine fisheries across 15 regions in 11 nations to define the gap in inclusion that has developed between sectors. We focused on high‐income nations with a high level of RF governance and used a questionnaire to elicit expert knowledge on HSs due to the paucity of published documents. In total, 339 HSs were considered. We found that RF inclusion in HSs was more similar to the small‐scale sector (i.e., artisanal, cultural, or subsistence) than the commercial sector, with explicit operational objectives, data collection, performance indicators, reference points, and management controls lacking in many regions. Where specified, RF objectives focused on sustainability, economic value and catch allocation rather than directly relating to the recreational fishing experience. Conflicts with other sectors included competition with the commercial sector for limited resources, highlighting the importance of equitable resource allocation policies alongside HSs. We propose that RF be explicitly incorporated into HSs to ensure fisheries are ecologically, economically, and socially sustainable, and we recommend that fisheries organisations urgently review HSs for marine fisheries with a recreational component to close the harvest strategy gap among sectors.

Funder

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung

Fisheries Research and Development Corporation

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Aquatic Science,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics,Oceanography

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3