A single‐center, retrospective analysis to compare measurement of fibrinogen using the TEG6 analyzer to the Clauss measurement in children undergoing heart surgery

Author:

Gautam Nischal1ORCID,Tran Vy1,Griffin Evelyn1,Elliott Jehan1,Rydalch Eric1,Kerr Kelbie1,Wilkinson Alex J.2,Zhang Xu34,Saroukhani Sepideh34ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anesthesiology McGovern Medical School, UT Health Houston Houston Texas USA

2. McGovern Medical School, UT Health Houston Houston Texas USA

3. Division of Clinical and Translational Sciences, Department of Internal Medicine, McGovern Medical School The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Houston Texas USA

4. Biostatistics/Epidemiology/Research Design (BERD) component, Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences (CCTS) The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Houston Texas USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundNewer generation viscoelastic tests, TEG6s, offer point‐of‐care hemostatic therapy in adult patients. However, their efficacy in estimating fibrinogen levels in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery is not well established.AimsThis study evaluates TEG6s for estimating fibrinogen levels in pediatric cardiac surgery patients and its predictive capability for post‐bypass hypofibrinogenemia.MethodsA single‐center, retrospective study on pediatric patients (under 18 years) who underwent cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass from August 2020 and November 2022. Blood samples for estimated whole blood functional fibrinogen level via TEG6s (Haemonetics Inc.) and concurrent laboratory‐measured plasma fibrinogen via von Clauss assay were collected at pre‐ and post‐cardiopulmonary bypass.ResultsPaired data for TEG6s estimated functional fibrinogen levels and plasma fibrinogen were analyzed for 432 pediatric patients pre‐bypass. It was observed that functional fibrinogen consistently overestimated plasma fibrinogen across all age groups with a mean difference of 138 mg/dL (95% confidence interval [CI]: 128–149 mg/dL). This positive bias in the pre‐bypass data was confirmed by Bland–Altman analysis. Post‐bypass, functional fibrinogen estimates were comparable to plasma fibrinogen in all patient groups with a mean difference of −6 mg/dL (95% CI: −20–8 mg/dL) except for neonates, where functional fibrinogen levels underestimated plasma fibrinogen with a mean difference of −38 mg/dL (95% CI: −64 to −12 mg/dL). The predictive accuracy of functional fibrinogen for detecting post‐bypass hypofibrinogenemia (plasma fibrinogen ≤250 mg/dL) demonstrated overall fair accuracy in all patients, indicated by an area under the curve of 0.73 (95% CI: 0.65–0.80) and good accuracy among infants, with an area under the curve of 0.80 (95% CI: 0.70–0.90). Similar performance was observed in predicting critical post‐bypass hypofibrinogenemia (plasma fibrinogen ≤200 mg/dL). Based on these analyses, optimal cutoffs for predicting post‐bypass hypofibrinogenemia were established as a functional fibrinogen level ≤270 mg/dL and MAFF ≤15 mm.ConclusionThis study demonstrates that whole blood functional fibrinogen, as estimated by TEG6s, tends to overestimate baseline plasma fibrinogen levels in pediatric age groups but aligns more accurately post‐cardiopulmonary bypass, particularly in neonates and infants, suggesting its potential as a point‐of‐care tool in pediatric cardiac surgery. However, the variability in TEG6s performance before and after bypass highlights the need for careful interpretation of its results in clinical decision‐making. Despite its contributions to understanding TEG6s in pediatric cardiac surgery, the study's design and inherent biases warrant cautious application of these findings in clinical settings.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. A Year of Changes: The End of the Pandemic Marks the Beginning of New Priorities;Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia;2024-05-10

2. The Year in Review: Anesthesia for Congenital Heart Disease 2023;Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia;2024-04-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3