Online health information on sinonasal inverted papillomas: An assessment on readability and quality

Abstract

AbstractBackground/ObjectivesSinonasal inverted papilloma (IP) is a rare but serious diagnosis, with a paucity of patient‐centred information regarding this condition. As more patients are seeking healthcare information online, the quality and comprehensibility of this information becomes ever more important. The aim of the study was to investigate the readability and quality of websites on inverted papilloma.MethodsThe term IP and seven of its synonyms were inputted into the three of the most commonly used search engines in the English‐speaking world (Google, Yahoo and Bing). The first 20 results returned for each search term were then screened with our exclusion criteria. The remaining websites were assessed for their readability using the using the Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES) and average grade level (AGL). Quality was assessed using the DISCERN questionnaire.ResultsOf the 480 websites returned using our search strategy, 410 were excluded using our screening criteria. Removal of duplicates from the remaining 70 websites left 14 for inclusion in the final analysis. The mean FRES score of the remaining websites was 30.5 ± 10 and the mean AGL was 15.2 ± 1.1, corresponding to a reading age of a 21‐year‐old. The median DISCERN score was 33.5 (30.5–36.5), a score which falls within the ‘poor quality’ range.ConclusionThe readability and quality of online patient information on IP is far below the expected standard. Healthcare providers have a responsibility to direct patients to appropriate sources of information or consider producing new material should a lack of appropriate sources exist.