Impact of the geriatric emergency medicine specialist intervention on final emergency department disposition

Author:

Cohen Inessa1ORCID,Sangal Rohit B.1,Taylor Richard Andrew12,Crawford Anna1,Lai James M.3,Martin Pamela4,Palleschi Sarah4,Rothenberg Craig1,Tomasino Debra1ORCID,Hwang Ula15ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Emergency Medicine Yale University School of Medicine New Haven Connecticut USA

2. Section for Biomedical Informatics and Data Science Yale University School of Medicine New Haven Connecticut USA

3. Division of Geriatrics and Palliative Care, Department of Internal Medicine NYU Grossman School of Medicine New York New York USA

4. Department of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics Yale School of Medicine New Haven Connecticut USA

5. Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, James J. Peters VA Medical Center Bronx New York USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThe Geriatric Emergency Medicine Specialist (GEMS) pilot program is an innovative approach that utilizes geriatric‐trained advanced practice providers to facilitate geriatric assessments and care planning for older adults in the emergency department (ED). The objective of this study was to explore the effect of GEMS on the use of observation status and final ED disposition.MethodsThis was a retrospective study under a target trial emulation framework. Geriatric patients (65+ years old) who presented to two ED sites within a large regional healthcare system between December 2020 and December 2022 were included. The primary outcome was final ED disposition (discharge, hospital inpatient admission, or hospital observation admission). Secondary outcomes included ED observation and ED length of stay. Non‐GEMS patients were propensity score matched 5:1 to GEMS patients. Doubly robust regression was used to estimate the odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals of inpatient admission, discharge, hospital observation admission, ED observation admission, and estimate the mean ED length of stay.ResultsA total of 427 of 43,064 total patients (1.0%) received a GEMS intervention during the study period. Our analysis included 2,302 geriatric ED patients (410 GEMS, 1,892 non‐GEMS) after propensity score matching. Hospital admission rates were 34.1% for GEMS compared to 56.4% for conventional treatment. GEMS patients had decreased odds of inpatient admission (OR: 0.41, 95 CI: 0.34–0.51, p < 0.001), increased odds of discharge (OR: 1.19 95 CI: 1.00–1.42, p = 0.047), hospital observation admission (OR: 2.97, 95 CI: 2.35–3.75, p < 0.001), ED observation admission (OR: 4.84 95 CI: 3.67–6.38, p < 0.001), and had a longer average ED length of stay (170 min, 95 CI: 84.6–256, p < 0.001) compared to non‐GEMS patients.ConclusionsPatients seen by GEMS during their ED visit were associated with higher rates of hospital discharge and lower rates of hospital admissions.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference39 articles.

1. Characteristics and Trends of Emergency Department Visits in the United States (2010–2014)

2. Trends in Geriatric Emergency Medicine

3. The Geriatric Emergency Department

4. Emergency Department Volume, Severity, and Crowding Since the Onset of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic

5. ACEP Press Release. ACEP Launches Geriatric Emergency Department Accreditation Program.American College of Emergency Physicians (online).2018.https://www.acep.org/siteassets/sites/acep/media/geda-documents/gedapilotannoucement.pdf

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Journal update monthly top five;Emergency Medicine Journal;2024-07-22

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3