Affiliation:
1. Social Policy & Criminology The Open University Milton Keynes UK
2. Department of International Development King's College London London UK
3. Department of Sociology Durham University Durham UK
Abstract
AbstractThe concept of social infrastructure has experienced a rapid rise to prominence in recent years, both in academia and in policy. In this article, we explore a case study of cages (also known as Multi‐Use Games Areas) in Hackney, North‐East London. We argue that cages are forms of urban infrastructure which can facilitate multiple forms of sociality—especially for young people—and can thus be deemed valuable social infrastructure. However, this value can only be understood in context—in relation to the joys and harms of growing up in Hackney—and as in contest—the status and meaning of the cage is different for different groups, and there are considerable tensions over their use, ownership, and management. In our examination of the cage, we aim to explore and build upon existing conceptions of social infrastructure.
Reference87 articles.
1. Account Hackney(2020) “Policing in Hackney: Challenges from Youth in 2020.”https://www.accounthackney.org/research(last accessed 30 March 2023)
2. AlmeidaA(2021)“Pushed to the Margins: A Quantitative Analysis of Gentrification in London in the 2010s.” Runnymede and Centre for Labour and Social Studies (CLASS)https://www.runnymedetrust.org/publications/pushed‐to‐the‐margins(last accessed 30 March 2023)
3. “Wilding” in the West Village: Queer space, racism, and Jane Jacobs hagiography;Andersson J;International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,2015
4. More than a game: Embodied everyday anti‐racism among young Filipino‐Australian street ballers;Aquino K;Journal of Intercultural Studies,2015
5. Criminological perspectives on school exclusion and youth offending;Arnez J;Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties,2021