Are accounting standards understandable?

Author:

Howieson Bryan1ORCID,Loftus Janice1,Schührer Sabine1

Affiliation:

1. Adelaide Business School University of Adelaide Adelaide South Australia Australia

Abstract

AbstractThere is concern that accounting standards are difficult to understand by those who use them. We investigate factors that enhance and inhibit the ability of the standards' users to comprehend their meaning and requirements. Readability statistics reveal that Australian accounting standards are difficult or very difficult to read. Interviews with experienced financial statement preparers and auditors from the for‐profit, not‐for‐profit private, and public sectors reveal that ‘understandability’ is a function of many inter‐related factors, only some of which relate to how standards are written and presented. We offer recommendations to standards‐setters about how the understandability of standards could be improved.

Funder

Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous),Finance,Accounting

Reference33 articles.

1. An empirical evaluation of the communication of authoritative pronouncements in accounting;Adelberg A.H.;Accounting and Finance,1982

2. Association of Chartered Certified Accountants. (2009)Complexity in financial reporting. Available from:https://www.accaglobal.com/content/dam/acca/global/PDF‐technical/financial‐reporting/tech‐ms‐com.pdf[Accessed 18th February 2020].

3. Australian Accounting Standards Board. (2019)AASB Research Forum 2020: call for academic expressions of interest. Available from:https://www.aasb.gov.au/admin/file/content102/c3/AASBRF2020_EOI.PDF[Accessed 21st April 2020].

4. Australian Institute of Company Directors. (2004)It's not what you say accounting. Available from:http://www.companydirectors.com.au/director‐resource‐centre/publications/company‐director‐magazine/2000‐to‐2009‐back‐editions/2004/october/its‐not‐what‐you‐say‐‐accounting[Accessed 21st April 2020].

5. Using thematic analysis in psychology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3