Aligning disclosure requirements for managerial assessments of going concern risk: Initial evidence from New Zealand

Author:

Grosse Matthew1ORCID,Scott Tom2ORCID,Zang Zeting2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Accounting Discipline Group University of Technology Sydney Broadway NSW Australia

2. Accounting Department Auckland University of Technology Auckland New Zealand

Abstract

AbstractThis study examines the impact of the Financial Reporting Standard No. 44 New Zealand Additional Disclosures (FRS 44) amendment issued by the New Zealand Accounting Standards Board (NZASB). The FRS 44 amendment aligned disclosure requirements for managerial assessments of going concern risk in financial reports with auditing standards for periods ending on or after 30 September 2020. We first present descriptive evidence on the frequency of going concern opinions (GCO), frequency of going concern issues identified as key audit matters (GCKAM), and frequency and content of managerial assessments of going concern risk (GCMA) before and after the FRS 44 amendment. Second, we show lower audit fees and shorter audit lags for financially distressed companies post‐FRS 44 implementation. This suggests that the harmonisation of accounting and auditing disclosure requirements alleviates tension during the going concern decision‐making process for affected companies, subsequently leading to reduced audit fees.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous),Finance,Accounting

Reference52 articles.

1. Do going concern disclosures in the management report and audit report signal bankruptcy risk? Evidence from privately held firms

2. Auditor, client and investor consequences of the enhanced auditor's report

3. Australian Accounting Standards Board. (2021)Going concern disclosures: a case for international standard‐setting AASB staff paper. Available from:https://www.aasb.gov.au/media/nbzbbg2x/sp_goingconcerndisclosures_10‐21.pdf[Accessed 20th January 2022].

4. Evidence on going concern reporting before and after ASU 2014–15

5. Investor Reaction to Auditors' Going Concern Emphasis of Matter: Evidence from a Natural Experiment

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3