Affiliation:
1. Countryside and Community Research Institute University of Gloucestershire Cheltenham UK
2. Strutt & Parker London UK
Abstract
AbstractAchieving successful multi‐stakeholder collaboration for sustainable outcomes is complex. This paper provides key principles for future co‐design projects aimed at fostering an inclusive approach to research. These have been developed based on a novel methodology that co‐designed the essential components of a long‐term, collaborative agreement for a nature recovery scheme in England. Using an assortment of iterative, deliberative participatory methods, this research engaged a wide variety of stakeholders to produce a template agreement for an agri‐environmental policy. We demonstrate that a flexible, highly reflective approach resulted in positive engagement with previously marginalised stakeholders. The approach also successfully navigated the unequal power dynamics seen both within and between groups. Finally, multiple feedback loops allowed participants to continually build on previous interactions as they developed and reviewed the agreement. By drawing out the complexities of the co‐design process, this paper explains how co‐design efforts can produce potentially transformative outputs. We hope that the principles introduced here offer a useful starting point for those planning to undertake multi‐stakeholder co‐design.
Funder
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, UK Government
Reference35 articles.
1. Co-management and the co-production of knowledge: Learning to adapt in Canada's Arctic
2. Barkley L. Chivers C.&Short C.(2023)Co‐designing long‐term agreements for landscape recovery: Final report.Environmental Land Management Test and Trial for Defra. Available from:https://eprints.glos.ac.uk/12624/
3. Barkley L. Short C.&Chivers C.(2022)Long‐term agreements and blended finance for landscape recovery: Rapid evidence assessment report.Environmental Land Management Test and Trial for Defra. Available from:https://eprints.glos.ac.uk/11186/
4. Just Transformations to Sustainability
5. How to foster agroecological innovations? A comparison of participatory design methods
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献