COVID‐19 vaccine attitudes and facilitators among people in Australia who inject drugs

Author:

Price Olivia1ORCID,Maher Lisa2,Dietze Paul M.1345ORCID,Bruno Raimondo16,Crawford Sione7,Sutherland Rachel1ORCID,Salom Caroline18,Dore Gregory J.2,Peacock Amy16ORCID

Affiliation:

1. National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre UNSW Sydney Sydney Australia

2. Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney Sydney Australia

3. Behaviours and Health Risks Program, Burnet Institute Melbourne Australia

4. National Drug Research Institute Melbourne Australia

5. Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine Monash University Melbourne Australia

6. School of Psychological Science University of Tasmania Hobart Australia

7. Harm Reduction Victoria Melbourne Australia

8. Institute for Social Science Research University of Queensland Brisbane Australia

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionWe aimed to describe COVID‐19 vaccination attitudes and identify potential facilitators for vaccine uptake among people who inject drugs.MethodsPeople who inject drugs were recruited from all eight Australian capital cities (N = 884; 65% male, mean age 44 years) and interviewed face‐to‐face or via telephone in June–July 2021. COVID‐19 and broader vaccination attitudes were used to model latent classes. Correlates of class membership were assessed through multinomial logistic regression. Probability of endorsing potential vaccination facilitators were reported by class.ResultsThree classes of participants were identified: ‘vaccine acceptant' (39%), ‘vaccine hesitant' (34%) and ‘vaccine resistant' (27%). Those in the hesitant and resistant groups were younger, more likely to be unstably housed and less likely to have received the current season influenza vaccine than the acceptant group. In addition, hesitant participants were less likely to report a chronic medical condition than acceptant participants. Compared to vaccine acceptant and hesitant participants, vaccine‐resistant participants were more likely to predominantly inject methamphetamine and to inject drugs more frequently in the past month. Both vaccine‐hesitant and resistant participants endorsed financial incentives for vaccination and hesitant participants also endorsed facilitators related to vaccine trust.Discussion and ConclusionPeople who inject drugs who are unstably housed or predominantly inject methamphetamine are subgroups that require targeted interventions to increase COVID‐19 vaccination uptake. Vaccine‐hesitant people may benefit from interventions that build trust in vaccine safety and utility. Financial incentives may improve vaccine uptake among both hesitant and resistant people.

Funder

Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Health (social science),Medicine (miscellaneous)

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3