Public support for and concerns regarding pediatric dose optimization for seizures in emergency medical services: An exception from informed consent (EFIC) trial

Author:

Ward Caleb E.1ORCID,Adelgais Kathleen M.2ORCID,Holsti Maija3,Jacobsen Kammy K.4,Simon Harold K.5ORCID,Morris Claudia R.5,Gonzalez Victor M.6,Lerner Gonzalo2,Ghaffari Kimia4,VanBuren John M.4,Lerner E. Brooke7ORCID,Shah Manish I.6ORCID,

Affiliation:

1. George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences Children's National Hospital Washington DC USA

2. University of Colorado School of Medicine Children's Hospital Colorado Aurora Colorado USA

3. University of Utah Primary Children's Medical Center Salt Lake City Utah USA

4. University of Utah Salt Lake City Utah USA

5. Emory University School of Medicine Children's Healthcare of Atlanta Atlanta Georgia USA

6. Baylor College of Medicine Texas Children's Hospital Houston Texas USA

7. University of Buffalo Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences Buffalo New York USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundFederal regulations allow exception from informed consent (EFIC) to study emergent conditions when obtaining prospective consent is not feasible. Little is known about public views on including children in EFIC studies. The Pediatric Dose Optimization for Seizures in EMS (PediDOSE) trial implements age‐based, standardized midazolam dosing for pediatric seizures. The primary objective of this study was to determine public support for and concerns about the PediDOSE EFIC trial. The secondary objective was to assess how support for PediDOSE varied by demographics.MethodsWe conducted a mixed‐methods study in 20 U.S. communities. Participants reviewed information about PediDOSE before completing an online survey. Descriptive data were generated. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis identified factors associated with support for PediDOSE. Reviewers identified themes from free‐text response data regarding participant concerns.ResultsOf 2450 respondents, 79% were parents/guardians, and 20% had a child with previous seizures. A total of 96% of respondents supported PediDOSE being conducted, and 70% approved of children being enrolled without prior consent. Non‐Hispanic Black respondents were less likely than non‐Hispanic White respondents to support PediDOSE with an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 0.57 (95% CI 0.42–0.75). Health care providers were more likely to support PediDOSE, with strongest support among prehospital emergency medicine clinicians (aOR 5.82, 95% CI 3.19–10.62). Age, gender, parental status, and level of education were not associated with support of PediDOSE. Common concerns about PediDOSE included adverse effects, legal and ethical concerns about enrolling without consent, and potential racial bias.ConclusionsIn communities where this study will occur, most respondents supported PediDOSE being conducted with EFIC and most approved of children being enrolled without prior consent. Support was lowest among non‐Hispanic Black respondents and highest among health care providers. Further research is needed to determine optimal ways to address the concerns of specific racial and ethnic groups when conducting EFIC trials.

Funder

Maternal and Child Health Bureau

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3