Prehospital lung ultrasound in acute heart failure: Impact on diagnosis and treatment

Abstract

AbstractObjectivePatients with acute heart failure (AHF) are commonly misdiagnosed and undertreated in the prehospital setting. These delays in diagnosis and treatment have a direct negative impact on patient outcomes. The goal of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of paramedics with and without the use of lung ultrasound (LUS) for the diagnosis of AHF in patients with dyspnea in the prehospital setting. Secondarily, we assessed LUS impact on rate of and time to initiation of HF therapies.MethodsThis was a prospective interventional study on a consecutive sample of patients transported to the hospital by one emergency medical services agency. Adult patients (>18 years) with a chief complaint of dyspnea were included. LUS was performed by trained paramedics and was defined as positive for AHF if both anterior–superior lung zones had greater than or equal to three B‐lines or bilateral B‐lines were visualized on a four‐view protocol. Paramedic diagnosis was compared to hospital discharge diagnosis which served as the criterion standard.ResultsOf the 264 included patients, 94 (35%) had a final diagnosis of AHF. Forty total patients had a LUS performed; 17 of these patients had a final diagnosis of AHF. Sensitivity and specificity for AHF by paramedics were 23% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.14–0.34) and 97% (95% CI 0.92–0.99) without LUS and 71% (95% CI 0.44–0.88) and 96% (95% CI 0.76–0.99) with the use of LUS. In the 94 patients with AHF, 14% (11/77) received HF therapy prehospital without the use of LUS and 53% (9/17) with the use of LUS. LUS improved frequency of treatment by 39%. Median time to treatment was 21 min with LUS and 169 min without.ConclusionsLUS improved paramedic sensitivity and accuracy for diagnosing AHF in the prehospital setting. LUS use led to higher rates of prehospital HF therapy initiation and significantly decreased time to treatment.