Trends in prehospital cervical collar utilization in trauma patients: Closer, but not there yet

Author:

Muzyka Logan1ORCID,Bradford James M.1,Teixeira Pedro G.1,DuBose Joseph1,Cardenas Tatiana C. P.1,Bach Michelle1,Ali Sadia1,Robert Michelle1,Brown Carlos V. R.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care Dell Medical School at The University of Texas at Austin Austin Texas USA

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveThis study aims to assess the change in cervical spine (C‐spine) immobilization frequency in trauma patients over time. We hypothesize that the frequency of unnecessary C‐spine immobilization has decreased.MethodsA retrospective chart review of adult trauma patients transported to our American College of Surgeons–verified Level I trauma center from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2021, was performed. Emergency medical services documentation was manually reviewed to record prehospital physiology and the application of a prehospital cervical collar (c‐collar). C‐spine injuries were defined as cervical vertebral fractures and/or spinal cord injuries. Univariate and year‐by‐year trend analyses were used to assess changes in C‐spine injury and immobilization frequency.ResultsAmong 2906 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 12% sustained C‐spine injuries, while 88% did not. Patients with C‐spine injuries were more likely to experience blunt trauma (95% vs. 68%, p < 0.001), were older (46 years vs. 41 years, p < 0.001), and had higher Injury Severity Scores (31 vs. 18, p < 0.001). They also exhibited lower initial systolic blood pressures (108 mm Hg vs. 119 mm Hg, p < 0.001), lower heart rates (92 beats/min vs. 97 beats/min, p < 0.05), and lower Glasgow Coma Scale scores (9 vs. 11, p < 0.001). In blunt trauma, c‐collars were applied to 83% of patients with C‐spine injuries and 75% without; for penetrating trauma, c‐collars were applied to 50% of patients with C‐spine injuries and only 8% without. Among penetrating trauma patients with C‐spine injury, all patients either arrived quadriplegic or did not require emergent neurosurgical intervention. The proportion of patients receiving a c‐collar decreased in both blunt and penetrating traumas from 2014 to 2021 (blunt—82% in 2014 to 68% in 2021; penetrating—24% in 2014 to 6% in 2021).ConclusionsUnnecessary C‐spine stabilization has decreased from 2014 to 2021. However, c‐collars are still being applied to patients who do not need them, both in blunt and in penetrating trauma cases, while not being applied to patients who would benefit from them.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Emergency Medicine,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3