Efficacy and safety of ultrasound‐guided erector spinae plane block compared to sham procedure in adult patients with rib fractures presenting to the emergency department: A randomized controlled trial

Author:

Ramesh Swetha1ORCID,Ayyan S. Manu1ORCID,Rath Durga Prasad2ORCID,Sadanandan Deepthy Melepurakkal3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Emergency Medicine & Trauma Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research Puducherry India

2. Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research Puducherry India

3. Research Scientist and Biostatistician, Women's & Children's Health Research Unit Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College of KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research (KAHER) Puducherry India

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesThe primary objective was to compare the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound‐guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) with a sham procedure in adult patients presenting with rib fractures to the emergency department (ED).MethodsA randomized controlled trial was conducted at an academic ED over a 17‐month period. Forty‐six adults with confirmed rib fractures and numeric rating score (NRS) greater than 4 were randomized to one of two treatment arms: ultrasound‐guided ESPB group or placebo (sham procedure). Intravenous opioids were prescribed as rescue analgesia when self‐reported pain scores were ≥4. The primary outcome measure, pain intensity reduction, was derived using the 11‐point NRS at six time points over 12 h. Secondary outcome measures included the amount of rescue analgesia, in morphine equivalents, and the occurrence of adverse events. Two‐way repeated‐measures ANOVA was used to compare the trend in NRSs across the two arms. The association between the complications and intervention was explored using the Fisher's exact test.ResultsForty‐six patients (23 in each arm) completed the study. There was no difference between treatment groups with respect to age, sex, vital signs, preenrollment analgesia, or baseline pain intensity. In comparing pain intensity during the study period, NRS scores at 30, 60, and 120 min were significantly lower in the ESPB group (p < 0.001) during rest and deep inspiration. Moreover, patients in the ESPB group received lesser rescue analgesia than those in the sham group (10 mg, IQR 2.5 vs. 20 mg, IQR 5 mg; p ≤ 0.01). There was no difference in adverse events between groups.ConclusionsUltrasound‐guided ESPB resulted in significantly reduced pain intensity over the study period and reduced amount of rescue analgesia and had no discernible difference in adverse events when compared with a sham.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Emergency Medicine,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3