A comparison of the effect of patient‐specific versus weight‐based protocols to treat vaso‐occlusive episodes in the emergency department

Author:

Tanabe Paula1ORCID,Ibemere Stephanie23,Pierce Ava E.4ORCID,Freiermuth Caroline E.5,Bosworth Hayden B.67,Yang Hongqui8,Osunkwo Ifeyinwa9,Paxton James H.10,Strouse John J.11,Miller Joseph12ORCID,Paice Judith A.13,Veeramreddy Padmaja14,Kavanagh Patricia L.15,Wilkerson R. Gentry16,Hughes Robert17,Barnhart Huiman X.18

Affiliation:

1. Duke University School of Nursing and School of Medicine Durham North Carolina USA

2. Duke University School of Nursing Durham North Carolina USA

3. Duke Global Health Institute Durham North Carolina USA

4. Department of Emergency Medicine The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas Texas USA

5. Emergency Medicine University of Cincinnati College of Medicine Cincinnati Ohio USA

6. Veterans Affairs Medical Center Durham, Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT) Durham North Carolina USA

7. Departments of Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Nursing Duke University Medical Center Durham North Carolina USA

8. Duke Clinical Research Institute Durham North Carolina USA

9. Atrium Health, Levine Cancer Institute, Sickle Cell Disease Enterprise Charlotte North Carolina USA

10. Emergency Medicine Wayne State University School of Medicine Detroit Michigan USA

11. Department of Medicine and Pediatrics Duke University School of Medicine Durham North Carolina USA

12. Emergency Medicine Detroit Henry Ford Health System Detroit Michigan USA

13. Division of Hematology‐Oncology Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Chicago Illinois USA

14. Atrium Health Charlotte North Carolina USA

15. Department of Pediatrics Boston University School of Medicine Boston Massachusetts USA

16. Emergency Medicine University of Maryland School of Medicine Baltimore Maryland USA

17. Emergency Medicine Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine Cleveland Ohio USA

18. Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Duke University School of Medicine, Duke Molecular Physiology Institute Durham North Carolina USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundVaso‐occlusive crises (VOCs) cause debilitating pain and are a common cause of emergency department (ED) visits, for people with sickle cell disease (SCD). Strategies for achieving optimal pain control vary widely despite evidence‐based guidelines. We tested existing guidelines and hypothesized that a patient‐specific pain protocol (PSP) written by their SCD provider may be more effective than weight‐based (WB) dosing of parenteral opiate medication, in relieving pain.MethodsThis study was a prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing a PSP versus WB protocol for patients presenting with VOCs to six EDs. Patients were randomized to a PSP or WB protocol prior to an ED visit. The SCD provider wrote their protocol and placed it in the electronic health record for future ED visits with VOC exclusion criteria that included preexisting PSP excluding parenteral opioid analgesia or outpatient use of buprenorphine or methadone or highly suspected for COVID‐19. Pain intensity scores, side effects, and safety were obtained every 30 min for up to 6 h post–ED bed placement. The primary outcome was change in pain intensity score from placement in an ED space to disposition or 6 h.ResultsA total of 328 subjects were randomized; 104 participants enrolled (ED visit, target n = 230) with complete data for 96 visits. The study was unable to reach the target sample size and stopped early due to the impact of COVID‐19. We found no significant differences between groups in the primary outcome; patients randomized to a PSP had a shorter ED length of stay (p = 0.008), and the prevalence of side effects was low in both groups. Subjects in both groups experienced both a clinically meaningful and a statistically significant decrease in pain (27 mm on a 0‐ to 100‐mm scale).ConclusionsWe found a shorter ED length of stay for patients assigned to a PSP. Patients in both groups experienced good pain relief without significant side effects.

Funder

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Emergency Medicine,General Medicine

Reference25 articles.

1. American Society of Hematology 2020 guidelines for sickle cell disease: management of acute and chronic pain

2. Evidence‐Based Management of Sickle Cell Disease Expert Panel Report 2014.U.S. Department of Health and Human Services National Institutes of Health National Heart Lung and Blood Institute.2014. Accessed xxx xx xxxx.http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health‐pro/guidelines/sickle‐cell‐disease‐guidelines/

3. Sickle Cell Disease Patients' Perceptions of Emergency Department Pain Management

4. A Survey-Based Needs Assessment of Barriers to Optimal Sickle Cell Disease Care in the Emergency Department

5. A randomized controlled trial comparing two vaso-occlusive episode (VOE) protocols in sickle cell disease (SCD)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3