The sonographic protocol for the emergent evaluation of aortic dissections (SPEED protocol): A multicenter, prospective, observational study

Author:

Gibbons Ryan C.1ORCID,Smith Dylan2,Feig Rivka3,Mulflur Molly4,Costantino Thomas G.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Emergency Medicine Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

2. Department of Emergency Medicine Winchester Medical Center Winchester Virginia USA

3. Department of Family Medicine Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine Lewistown Pennsylvania USA

4. Department of Emergency Medicine Saint Luke's Hospital Easton Pennsylvania USA

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesAn aortic dissection (AoD) is a potentially life‐threatening emergency with mortality rates exceeding 50%. While computed tomography angiography remains the diagnostic standard, patients may be too unstable to leave the emergency department. Investigators developed a point‐of‐care ultrasound (POCUS) protocol combining transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and the abdominal aorta. The study objective was to determine the test characteristics of this protocol.MethodsThis was an institutional review board–approved, multicenter, prospective, observational, cohort study of a convenience sample of adult patients. Patients suspected of having an AoD received a TTE and abdominal aorta POCUS. Three sonographic signs suggested AoD: a pericardial effusion, an intimal flap, or an aortic outflow track diameter measuring more than 35 mm. Investigators present continuous and categorical data as medians with interquartile ranges or proportions with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and utilized standard 2 × 2 tables on MedCalc (Version 19.1.6) to calculate test characteristics with 95% CI.ResultsInvestigators performed 1314 POCUS examinations, diagnosing 21 Stanford type A and 23 Stanford type B AoD. Forty‐one of the 44 cases had at least one of the aforementioned sonographic findings. The protocol has a sensitivity of 93.2% (95% CI 81.3–98.6), specificity of 90.9 (95% CI 89.2–92.5), positive and negative predictive values of 26.3% (95% CI 19.6–33.9) and 99.7% (95% CI 99.2–100), respectively, and an accuracy of 91% (95% CI 89.3–92.5).ConclusionsThe SPEED protocol has an overall sensitivity of 93.2% for AoD.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Emergency Medicine,General Medicine

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Aortic dissection presenting with respiratory failure: case report and literature;Emergency Care Journal;2024-09-02

2. Bedside-focused transthoracic echocardiography in acute atraumatic thoracic aortic syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy;European Journal of Emergency Medicine;2024-08-28

3. Response to Letter to Editor;Academic Emergency Medicine;2024-08-06

4. Ultrasound of the Aorta;Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America;2024-08

5. SPEED protocol;Academic Emergency Medicine;2024-07-27

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3