Performance of the 0/2‐hour high‐sensitivity cardiac troponin T diagnostic protocol in a multisite United States cohort

Author:

Supples Michael W.1ORCID,Snavely Anna C.12,Ashburn Nicklaus P.13ORCID,Allen Brandon R.4,Christenson Robert H.5,Nowak Richard6ORCID,Wilkerson R. Gentry7,Mumma Bryn E.8,Madsen Troy9,Stopyra Jason P.1ORCID,Mahler Simon A.11011ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Emergency Medicine Wake Forest School of Medicine Winston‐Salem North Carolina USA

2. Department of Biostatistics and Data Science Wake Forest School of Medicine Winston‐Salem North Carolina USA

3. Section on Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine Wake Forest School of Medicine Winston‐Salem North Carolina USA

4. Department of Emergency Medicine University of Florida College of Medicine Gainesville Florida USA

5. Department of Pathology University of Maryland School of Medicine Baltimore Massachusetts USA

6. Department of Emergency Medicine Henry Ford Health System Detroit Michigan USA

7. Department of Emergency Medicine University of Maryland School of Medicine Baltimore Massachusetts USA

8. Department of Emergency Medicine University of California Davis School of Medicine Sacramento California USA

9. Department of Emergency Medicine University of Utah School of Medicine Salt Lake City Utah USA

10. Department of Epidemiology and Prevention Wake Forest School of Medicine Winston‐Salem North Carolina USA

11. Department of Implementation Science Wake Forest School of Medicine Winston‐Salem North Carolina USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThe diagnostic performance of the high‐sensitivity troponin T (hs‐cTnT) 0/2‐h algorithm is unclear among U.S. emergency department (ED) patients with acute chest pain.MethodsA preplanned subgroup analysis of the STOP‐CP cohort study was conducted. Participants with 0‐ and 2‐h hs‐cTnT measures prospectively enrolled at eight U.S. EDs from January 2017 to September 2018 were stratified into rule‐out, observation, and rule‐in zones using the hs‐cTnT 0/2‐h algorithm alone and combined with the history, electrocardiogram, age, and risk factor (HEAR) score. The primary outcome was adjudicated 30‐day cardiac death or myocardial infarction (CDMI). The sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) of the 0/2‐h rule‐out zone and specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) of the rule‐in zone for 30‐day CDMI were calculated.ResultsOf the 1307 patients accrued, 53.6% (700/1307) were male and 58.6% (762/1307) were White, with a mean ± SD age of 57.5 ± 12.7 years. At 30 days, CDMI occurred in 12.9% (168/1307) of participants. The 0/2‐h algorithm ruled out 61.4% (802/1307) of patients. Among rule‐out patients, 1.9% (15/802) experienced 30‐day CDMI, resulting in a sensitivity of 91.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 85.7%–94.9%) and NPV of 98.1% (95% CI 96.9%–98.9%). The 0/2‐h algorithm ruled in 12.4% (162/1307) patients of whom 61.7% (100/162) experienced 30‐day CDMI. The rule‐in zone specificity was 94.6% (95% CI 93.1%–95.8%) and PPV was 61.7% (95% CI 53.8%–69.2%) for 30‐day CDMI. The 0/2‐h algorithm combined with HEAR score ruled out 30.7% (401/1307) of patients with a sensitivity and NPV for 30‐day CDMI of 98.2% (95% CI 94.9%–99.6%) and 99.3% (95% CI 97.8%–99.8%), respectively.ConclusionsThe hs‐cTnT 0/2‐h algorithm ruled out most patients. With NPV of <99% for 30‐day CDMI, the hs‐cTnT 0/2‐h algorithm, many emergency physicians may not consider it safe to use for U.S. ED patients. When combined with a low‐risk HEAR score, NPV was >99% for 30‐day CDMI at the cost of reduced efficacy.

Funder

Roche Diagnostics

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Emergency Medicine,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3