Affiliation:
1. Department of Emergency Medicine Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center & Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA
2. Blizard Institute for Neuroscience, Surgery, and Trauma Barts and The London School of Medicine London UK
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundBased on convincing evidence for outcomes improvement in the military setting, the past decade has seen evaluation of prehospital transfusion (PHT) in the civilian emergency medical services (EMS) setting. Evidence synthesis has been challenging, due to study design variation with respect to both exposure (type of blood product administered) and outcome (endpoint definitions and timing). The goal of the current meta‐analysis was to execute an overarching assessment of all civilian‐arena randomized controlled trial (RCT) evidence focusing on administration of blood products compared to control of no blood products.MethodThe review structure followed the Cochrane group's Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis (PRISMA). Using the Transfusion Evidence Library (transfusionevidencelibrary.com), the multidatabase (e.g. PubMed, EMBASE) Harvard On‐Line Library Information System (HOLLIS), and GoogleScholar, we accessed many databases and gray literature sources. RCTs of PHT in the civilian setting with a comparison group receiving no blood products with 1‐month mortality outcomes were identified.ResultsIn assessing a single patient‐centered endpoint—1‐month mortality—we calculated an overall risk ratio (RR) estimate. Analysis of three RCTs yielded a model with acceptable heterogeneity (I2 = 48%, Q‐test p = 0.13). Pooled estimate revealed civilian PHT results in a statistically nonsignificant (p = 0.38) relative mortality reduction of 13% (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.63–1.19).ConclusionsCurrent evidence does not demonstrate 1‐month mortality benefit of civilian‐setting PHT. This should give pause to EMS systems considering adoption of civilian‐setting PHT programs. Further studies should not only focus on which formulations of blood products might improve outcomes but also focus on which patients are most likely to benefit from any form of civilian‐setting PHT.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献