Assessing the one‐month mortality impact of civilian‐setting prehospital transfusion: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Author:

Schoenfeld David W.1ORCID,Rosen Carlo L.1,Harris Tim2,Thomas Stephen H.12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Emergency Medicine Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center & Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA

2. Blizard Institute for Neuroscience, Surgery, and Trauma Barts and The London School of Medicine London UK

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundBased on convincing evidence for outcomes improvement in the military setting, the past decade has seen evaluation of prehospital transfusion (PHT) in the civilian emergency medical services (EMS) setting. Evidence synthesis has been challenging, due to study design variation with respect to both exposure (type of blood product administered) and outcome (endpoint definitions and timing). The goal of the current meta‐analysis was to execute an overarching assessment of all civilian‐arena randomized controlled trial (RCT) evidence focusing on administration of blood products compared to control of no blood products.MethodThe review structure followed the Cochrane group's Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis (PRISMA). Using the Transfusion Evidence Library (transfusionevidencelibrary.com), the multidatabase (e.g. PubMed, EMBASE) Harvard On‐Line Library Information System (HOLLIS), and GoogleScholar, we accessed many databases and gray literature sources. RCTs of PHT in the civilian setting with a comparison group receiving no blood products with 1‐month mortality outcomes were identified.ResultsIn assessing a single patient‐centered endpoint—1‐month mortality—we calculated an overall risk ratio (RR) estimate. Analysis of three RCTs yielded a model with acceptable heterogeneity (I2 = 48%, Q‐test p = 0.13). Pooled estimate revealed civilian PHT results in a statistically nonsignificant (p = 0.38) relative mortality reduction of 13% (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.63–1.19).ConclusionsCurrent evidence does not demonstrate 1‐month mortality benefit of civilian‐setting PHT. This should give pause to EMS systems considering adoption of civilian‐setting PHT programs. Further studies should not only focus on which formulations of blood products might improve outcomes but also focus on which patients are most likely to benefit from any form of civilian‐setting PHT.

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Control of Haemorrhage in Orthopaedic Trauma;Journal of Clinical Medicine;2024-07-22

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3