Open versus robot‐assisted radical cystectomy: pentafecta and trifecta achievement comparison from a randomised controlled trial

Abstract

ObjectivesTo compare University of Southern California (USC) Institute of Urology pentafecta and trifecta achievement comparing open radical cystectomy (ORC) vs robot‐assisted RC (RARC) with totally intracorporeal urinary diversion (iUD) from a randomised controlled trial (RCT).Patients and MethodsPatients were eligible for randomisation if they had a diagnostic transurethral resection of bladder tumour with clinical T stage (cT)2–4, cN0, cM0, or recurrent high‐grade non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer and no anaesthesia contraindications to robotic surgery. Patients were enrolled with a covariate adaptive randomisation process based on the following variables: body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, preoperative haemoglobin, planned UD, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and cT stage. USC pentafecta was defined as the combination at 1 year after surgery of: negative soft tissue surgical margins, ≥16 lymph node (LN) yield, absence of major (Clavien–Dindo Grade ≥III) complications at 90 days, absence of UD‐related long‐term sequalae, and absence of clinical recurrence. Trifecta was defined as the coexistence of daytime urinary continence, absence of major complications and recurrence‐free status, all assessed at 1 year. Continuous and categorical variables were compared using Student's t‐test and chi‐square test, respectively. Univariable logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the role of USC pentafecta and trifecta achievement on health‐related quality of life (HRQoL).ResultsThere was no statistically significant difference in USC pentafecta and trifecta achievement between groups. Among secondary outcomes, univariable logistic regression analysis was performed and both 1‐year USC pentafecta and trifecta achievement were predictors of 2‐year unmodified global HRQoL.ConclusionsThis study supports equivalence of RARC‐iUD and ORC with regard to surgical quality as described by the USC pentafecta and trifecta. We described a significant impact of USC pentafecta and trifecta achievement on global health status/HRQoL, providing a strict correlation between objective evaluation of surgical outcomes and self‐reported HRQoL.